It is an issue of controversy over whether national budgets should be allocated for the renovation of historic buildings or the massive construction of novel infrastructure. While I suppose that the magnitude of preserving old erections should not be underestimated, I hold a belief that the emergence of new accommodations and transport networks could be beneficial to some extent.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why ministry officials feel duty-bound to implement effective campaigns for rehabilitating ancient monuments. First and foremost, this action could play an instrumental role in conserving the cultural heritage of humanity as well as creating a variety of municipal identities. An explanation is that these buildings act as witnesses to the process of formation and development of metropolitan areas. As a result, a complete overhaul of old buildings could assist youngsters to gain deeper insight into the contribution of predecessors, followed by the fact that this could cultivate their national pride and attach importance to traditional values. Secondly, the reconstruction of old properties could exert desirable impacts on the development of the tourism sector. Therefore, this could be conducive to a proliferation of profits for this smokeless industry. For instance, thanks to supportive government policies in Vietnam, Hoi An could not only become a long-term tourist attraction but also gain foreign currency earnings from international sightseers.
On the other hand, instead of refurbishing ancient relics, it is advisable for national authorities to have taken extensive initiatives to finance infrastructure projects. Firstly, the construction of public facilities could be of paramount importance to the mitigation of burning issues such as homelessness, unemployment, and traffic congestion. As a consequence, it could accelerate the improvement of living standards for individuals, especially those in rural areas. This can be exemplified by the fact that the growth of public systems and workplaces could facilitate the seeking for professional opportunities for local citizens, allowing them to lead a better life. Furthermore, there is little room for doubt that the government should give priority to the investment of manifold social constructions to attract vast amounts of foreign capital. Hence, member states can stand a chance of participating in the global production network, which could pave the way for the prosperity of export industries and promote international trade with other countries in the region and the world.
In conclusion, although I contend that it is of necessity to embark on the refurbishment of aged buildings, I subscribe to the opinion that there is a need for authorities to concentrate their resources on constructing highway systems and human dwelling houses.