The notion that tourism is the prime contributor to underestimation and impiety of native customs and traditions is a topic of considerable discussion. While some claim that tourism should be prohibited in local areas to protect its history and culture, the opposition considers that this concept seems to be totally meaningless. This essay will explore both views but adhere to the point of view that prohibiting tourism is prone to have a useless impact because in today’s contemporary world the need of observing historically essential objects with one’s own eyes has gradually gone.
It is asserted by many that excessive tourism in a country with a sustainable flora and fauna significantly jeopardizes its biodiversity and contributes to ecological degradation. In addition to that, abroad visitors are prone to flaunt intolerance towards the local traditions and behave in an inappropriate way. Consequently, the most viable solution seems to be the constraining of this manifestation. For instance, technological advancements and globalization have significantly altered cultural landscapes worldwide, rendering complete preservation challenging. Such changes took place even in places like Japan which was close to foreigners for many decades.
On the other hand, we have to admit that we live in the rapidly evolving digital century; people are provided with a broad range of various data so the need for travel and seeing nature with people’s own eyes has disappeared. Moreover, banning tourist industry will facilitate the destruction of the native historical heritage as individuals will stop visiting and maintaining this zone. The delicate balance between tradition and tourism can be observed in Bali, where excessive tourism has significantly impacted the island’s cultural integrity, eroding its authenticity.
To reiterate this essay, I would like to underline the phenomenon that though the output of excessive tourism may contribute in various sustainable for environment and social position objectionable ramifications, by maintaining this phenomenon humans are given incentives to support this paramount concern; selective limitations on tourism in certain areas can serve as a protective shield, preserving the authenticity and richness of indigenous cultures for future generations.