Nowadays people are leaning towards living in homes without outdoor areas due to the raising population in cities. I consider this to be more of a negative development.
On the one hand, there might be some benefits involved in this trend. Choosing to live in homes with limited outdoor space decreases the cost of accommodation. They are easier to maintain and generally more affordable, which is beneficial especially for young families and low-income residents. Additionally, this phenomenon leads to more efficient land use in crowded cities. Reducing private outdoor spaces allows cities to use land for other purposes such as shopping centers or railways.
On the other hand, there are several negative consequences associated with living in homes without outdoor areas. This type of living has harmful effects on mental health. With a lack of outdoor space, people have fewer opportunities to relax, unwind, or connect with the simplicity of nature, which has a detrimental effect on mental well-being. Another drawback is that limiting outdoor space means limiting green areas, which can negatively affect air quality. Green space can absorb CO₂ and produce O₂. When people don’t have flowers or trees in their house, more CO₂ will remain in the air, which can increase air pollution.
In conclusion, while living in homes with limited outdoor spaces can have some positive effects such as lower accommodation costs, I strongly believe that its drawbacks, including mental health issues and air pollution, are by far more significant.