🔥 Today Only: Save 30% on Premium — Offer Ends Soon! - Upgrade Now!
Bar Chart

Band 4+: The graph below shows the result of a survey of patients who stayed in three different wards* of a hospital. It shows what percentage of the patients replied 'very good' about various aspects of their hospital experience. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons wherever relevant.

Image for topic: The graph below shows the result of a survey of patients who stayed in three different wards* of a hospital. It shows what percentage of the patients replied 'very good' about various aspects of their hospital experience. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons wherever relevant.
Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.
The image displays a bar graph comparing the percentage of patients who replied "very good" about their hospital experience by three different wards: Holly, Maple, and Oak, across four categories. For 'Hospital staff', Holly Ward is at 60%, Maple Ward at 50%, and Oak Ward at 70%. 'Waiting time' shows Holly at around 40%, Maple at 30%, and Oak at 30%. 'Quality of treatment' has Holly at 90%, Maple at 80%, and Oak at near 100%. Lastly, 'Quality of aftercare' depicts Holly at 80%, Maple at 70%, and Oak at 90%.
Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.
Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The bar chart compares the percentage of patients in three hospital wards – Holly, Maple, and Oak in terms of hospital staff, waiting time, quality of treatment and quality of aftercare.

Overall, Holly Ward received the highest ratings among all categories, whereas Maple Ward had the lowest figures.

Holly ward represented the best performance in all categories, with nearly 90% of people ranking hospital staff as very good. Both quality of treatment and quality of aftercare represented nearly the same percentage of people at around 90% who ranked as very good. However, only around 75% of people rated waiting time as very good.

Word Count: 103

Answers On The Same Topic:

The graph below shows the result of a survey of patients who stayed in three different wards* of a hospital. It shows what percentage of the patients replied ‘very good’ about various aspects of their hospital experience. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons wherever relevant.

The bar graph illustrates the percentage of patients in three wardsof a hospital who replied very good about four aspects of their hospital experience in a survey. Overall, it clearly shows that holly ward experinced the highest percentage of very good in all categories. On the other hand, maple was on at bottom in all […]

The graph below shows the result of a survey of patients who stayed in three different wards* of a hospital. It shows what percentage of the patients replied ‘very good’ about various aspects of their hospital experience. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons wherever relevant.

The bar chart compares the percentages of patients in three hospital wards (Holly, Maple and Oak) who rated four aspects of their stay as “very good”. Overall, Holly Ward received the most favourable feedback in every category, while Maple generally recorded the lowest scores; the only exception was waiting time, where Maple slightly outperformed Oak. […]

The graph below shows the result of a survey of patients who stayed in three different wards* of a hospital. It shows what percentage of the patients replied ‘very good’ about various aspects of their hospital experience. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons wherever relevant.

This chart illustrate how the percentage of patients rating three different ward across four categories, as ‘Very good’. Overall, Holy ward rating surpasses relatively other wards. Conversely, maple ward rating is lower than the other wards but Oak ward is between the other two, according to ratings. 90% patient rates quality of treatment of holy […]

The graph below shows the result of a survey of patients who stayed in three different wards* of a hospital. It shows what percentage of the patients replied ‘very good’ about various aspects of their hospital experience. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons wherever relevant.

The bar chart illustrates the percentage of four different patients namely, Hospital staff, waiting time, quality of treatment, and quality of aftercare, those were replied ward called “very good” about their hospital experience. Overall, while the figure for Holly ward was highest in all patients, that for Maple ward was lowest except in the waiting […]

See All

Other Topics:

The chart below shows the number of jobs in tourism-related industry in one UK city between 1989 and 2009

The bar chart compares the number of jobs in tourism-related industries in the UK from 1989 to 2009. Overall, the number of jobs in restaurants experienced a dramatic increase, consistently outpacing other sectors. In contrast, the number of jobs in hotels showed a period of stability with slight fluctuations. Meanwhile, jobs in sport and leisure, […]

The chart below shows the number of jobs in tourism-related industry in one UK city between 1989 and 2009

The bar chart compares information about how many jobs were there in tourism concerned industries in the UK from 1989 to 2009. Overall, the figure for restaurants saw a dramatic increase and become the consistently higher figure, while that for hotels observed a period of stability with slight fluctuations. Meanwhile jobs in sport and leisure […]

the chart below shows the aid from six developed countries to developing countries from 2008 - 2010.

The bar chart compares the differences foreign aid from six developed countries from 2008 to 2010. The chart shows how much money this developed countries donated to foreign aid. At all, all countries developed their aid slightly throughout the year, although some fluctuations can be seen. USA giving the highest amount of funding. While Sweden […]

the bar chart shows the number of cars per 1000 people in 5 European countries in 3 years and compares with the European average.

The chart illustrates the number of car owners per 1,000 people in five European countries in 2005, 2009 and 2015, compared with the European average. Overall, Countries 1 and 2 had lower levels of car ownership than the European average throughout the period, whereas the remaining countries recorded higher figures. In addition, Country 5 consistently […]

the bar chart shows the number of cars per 1000 people in 5 European countries in 3 years and compares with the European average.

The data gives information about the figure of car owners per 1000 people in European nations in 3 several years: 2005,2009 and 2015 and compares with European avarage. Overall, while the number of cars per 1000 people showed smaller numbers in Country 1 and Country 2 where are compared with avarage, the reverse was true […]

The charts below show the percentages of male and female students getting top grades in 1960 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The below chart presents information about the proportion of famele and male students getting top grades of various subjects over the period from 1960 and 2000. Overall, humanities showed the largest percentage for male while, art peresent the lowest proportion. Moreover, languages illustrated the higher proportion for famele. However, science had the lowest proportion. First […]

See All
We have detected unusual activity on your device.
Please verify your identity to continue.
Note: This verification step won't sign you in. If you have a premium account, please log in to access the service as usual.
Google/Gmail Verification
Or verify using Email/Code
We've sent a verification code to:
youremail@gmail.com (Not your email?)
Enter it below to complete the verification process.
Ensure your email address is correct, your inbox is not full, and you check your spam folder. If no email arrives, consider using an alternative email.
You will need a Premium plan to perform your action!
Note: If you already have a premium account, please log in to access our services as usual.

Plans & Pricing

Our mission is to make quality education accessible for everyone.
However, to keep our hardworking team running and this service alive, we genuinely need your support!
By opting for a premium plan, not only do you sustain us in achieving the mission, but you also unlock advanced features to enrich your learning experience.

Free

For learners who aren't pressed for time

What's included on Free
100+ Cambridge IELTS Tests
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation (2 times/month)
Instant IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation (5 times/month)
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator (2 times/month)
500+ Dictation & Shadowing Exercises
100+ Pronunciation Exercises
Flashcards
Other Advanced Tools

Premium

For those serious about advancing their English proficiency, and for IELTS candidates aspiring to boost their band score by 1-2 points (especially in writing & speaking) in just 30 days or less

What's included on Premium
Save Your IELTS Test Progress
Unlock All Courses & IELTS Tests
Unlimited AI Conversations
Unlimited AI Writing Enhancement Exercises
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation
Checked Answers Will Not Be Published
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Sample Generator
Unlimited Usage Of Advanced Tools
Priority Support within 24h (12-month plan only)

Due to the nature of our service and the provided free trials, payments are non-refundable.
Nếu bạn là người Việt Nam và không có hoặc không muốn trả bằng credit/debit cards, bạn có thể thanh toán bằng phương thức chuyển khoản:



Chọn gói:
419,000₫ 277,000 ₫ cho gói 1 tháng (chỉ 9,233₫/ngày)
1,239,000₫ 597,000 ₫ cho gói 3 tháng (chỉ 6,633₫/ngày)
2,469,000₫ 1,027,000 ₫ cho gói 6 tháng (chỉ 5,706₫/ngày)
4,929,000₫ 1,417,000 ₫ cho gói 12 tháng (chỉ 3,936₫/ngày)


Sau khi chuyển khoản, vui lòng đợi trình duyệt tự động điều hướng bạn trở lại Engnovate và bạn sẽ ngay lập tức nhận được mã kích hoạt tài khoản premium.
Nếu có lỗi xảy ra, bạn có thể liên hệ với team thông qua một trong các phương thức: email đến helloengnovate@gmail.com hoặc nhắn tin qua facebook.com/engnovate.
Vì toàn bộ công cụ trên website đều có thể sử dụng thử miễn phí, Engnovate không hỗ trợ hoàn tiền.