It is often argued that universities should only teach courses that were chosen by students, while others are firm in their belief that all subjects are important for future job. This essay will discuss both statements below.
On the one hand, learning only those lessons that are suitable for students speciality has several advantages. In modern competitive era, students spend a lot of money on higher education, so they expect to secure well-paid jobs after the graduation. Subjects such as medicine, engineering, business and informatics provide practical skills that are highly valuable on labour-market. For example, many countries currently face lack of software engineers and healthcare workers, which means graduates from these fields are more likely to find stable employment quickly. As a result, focusing on career-orientated courses can contribute to economic growth and reduce unemployment.
On the other hand, subjects like history, art, psychology also play an essential role in society. These disciplines help students to develop creativity, critical thinking and communication skills which are important in some professions. In addition, historical subjects preserve cultural heritage can encourage people to prospective and historical events. Without artists, writers, and historians, society would become less creative and culturally rich.
To conclude, although universities should provide that prepare students for employment, arts and humanities subjects are equally important because they stimulate cultural development and intellectual growth. In my view, teaching all courses gives advantages in long-term period.