Recently, there have been a few nations where the proportion of youth who select work-based training is greater than that of those who opt to enroll in third-level education. This choice comes with a set of advantages and disadvantages that should be kept in mind before making a decision.
Those who adhere to the view that work-based training gives more return on investment think that practical knowledge is more important than theoretical knowledge in the contemporary world. One positive aspect of this decision is that young people become familiar with the real world more quickly. This is because they work on the job site and learn skills specific to that industry. In addition, they work alongside those who have spent years in that industry, resulting in guidance and support. Another reason is that students can have a source of income right after secondary school.
On the flip side, university education can prove to be a better use of youth’s time after high school because it bridges the gap between high school education and real-world employment. Higher education often teaches us the theoretical prerequisites that aren’t always covered in secondary school. These will be vital to the jobs that students will do in the future. Furthermore, at universities, students often have internship opportunities, which give them real job experience and allow them to apply the theory that they have learnt.
In conclusion, while work-based training right after high school may seem attractive to modern youth, higher education provides the background information and fundamental knowledge that is essential for real-world professions.