Band 6+: The bar charts illustrate the reliability of print and non-print academic materials as reported by undergraduate and postgraduate students at three British universities: the University of Oxford, the University of Cambridge, and the University of Leeds. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The column charts illustrates the proportion dependency of under-graduate and post-graduate pupils on soft and hard copies of education materials from three distinct British universities.

Overall, printed and non-printed both highlighted an opposite feature. Majority of post graduate students from all three universities preferred to use printed materials, whereas most bachelor students depend on non-printed tools.

Students engage in post-graduate studies at Oxford, Cambridge and Leeds were the prominent users of print materials. Almost identical proportion of these students, with around 89% to 93%, are comfortable to learn knowledge from hard copies of books or other materials. Conversely, 77% to 80% bachelor students adopt print materials for education.

However, this scenario is reversed in terms of non-printed resources. Soft copies of academics tools are popular among students who are in tertiary schooling, accounted for a similar rate of around 60% in all three universities, although these percentage are lower for post graduate students, sharing a proportion of approximately 50% from each universities.