People’s opinions differ about whether old complex should be preserved instead of other buildings.
From my point of view, I believe that it depends on what types of the buildings are.
On the one hand, it is obvious that houses which have historical meanings should be deserved being preserved or even enhanced. On the educational level, by protecting these complex, awareness and interest of younger generations in history maybe improved. They can visit these destinations, and they will have a chance to observe their ancestor’s achievements and what they had suffered during wars to protect their countries. As a result, teenagers will be fostered love towards their home hence trying to preserve and develop their countries.
On the other hand, it is also true that some buldings which are literally old should be demolished. Commonly, these bulidngs tend to be too fragile and they are always at risk of being collapsed, so they sould by knocked down as soon as possible to guarantee safety of citizens. Moreover, the cost for refurbishing these houses is considerable and it may surpass the original value of the house, thus we should demolish them instead. In addition, finances saved from this source can be used for other social purposes such as education or healthcare.
In conclusion, buldings with significant meanings should by preserved because they help kids to be more cognizant about practices and culture of their countries; however, literally old complex should by removed to enhance people’s safety and to save money for othe vital purposes.