Extinct: The Giant Deer - IELTS Reading Answers & Explanations
From IELTS Past Papers Academic Reading Test 03 · Part 3 · Questions 28–40
Reading Passage
Read the text below and answer questions 28-40.
Extinct: the Giant Deer
Toothed cats, mastodons, giant sloths, woolly rhinos, and many other big, shaggy mammals are widely thought to have died out around the end of the last ice age, some 10,500 years ago.
A. The Irish elk is also known as the giant deer (Megaloceros giganteus). Analysis of ancient bones and teeth by scientists based in Britain and Russia show the huge herbivore survived until about 5,000 B.C.—more than three millennia later than previously believed. The research team says this suggests additional factors, besides climate change, probably hastened the giant deer's eventual extinction. The factors could include hunting or habitat destruction by humans.
B. The Irish elk, so-called because its well-preserved remains are often found in lake sediments under peat bogs in Ireland, first appeared about 400,000 years ago in Europe and central Asia. Through a combination of radiocarbon dating of skeletal remains and the mapping of locations where the remains were unearthed, the team shows the Irish elk was widespread across Europe before the last "big freeze." The deer's range later contracted to the Ural Mountains, in modern-day Russia, which separate Europe from Asia.
C. The giant deer made its last stand in western Siberia, some 3,000 years after the ice sheets receded, said the study's co-author, Adrian Lister, professor of palaeobiology at University College London, England. "The eastern foothills of the Urals became very densely forested about 8,000 years ago, which could have pushed them on to the plain," he said. He added that pollen analysis indicates the region then became very dry in response to further climactic change, leading to the loss of important food plants. "In combination with human pressures, this could have finally snuffed them out," Lister said.
D. Hunting by humans has often been put forward as a contributory cause of extinctions of the Pleistocene mega fauna. The team, though, said their new date for the Irish elk's extinction hints at an additional human-made problem—habitat destruction. Lister said, "We haven't got just hunting 7,000 years ago—this was also about the time the first Neolithic people settled in the region. They were farmers who would have cleared the land." The presence of humans may help explain why the Irish elk was unable to tough out the latest of many climatic fluctuations—periods it had survived in the past.
E. Meanwhile, Lister cast doubt on another possible explanation for the deer's demise—the male's huge antlers. Some scientists have suggested this exaggerated feature—the result of females preferring stags with the largest antlers, possibly because they advertised a male's fitness —contributed to the mammal's downfall. They say such antlers would have been a serious inconvenience in the dense forests that spread northward after the last ice age. But, Lister said, "That's a hard argument to make, because the deer previously survived perfectly well through wooded interglacials [warmer periods between ice ages]." Some research has suggested that a lack of sufficient high-quality forage caused the extinction of the elk. High amounts of calcium and phosphate compounds are required to form antlers, and therefore large quantities of these minerals are required for the massive structures of the Irish Elk. The males (and male deer in general) met this requirement partly from their bones, replenishing them from food plants after the antlers were grown or reclaiming the nutrients from discarded antlers (as has been observed in extant deer). Thus, in the antler growth phase. Giant Deer were suffering from a condition similar to osteoporosis. When the climate changed at the end of the last glacial period, the vegetation in the animal's habitat also changed towards species that presumably could not deliver sufficient amounts of the required minerals, at least in the western part of its range.
F. The extinction of megafauna around the world was almost completed by the end of the last ice age. It is believed that megafauna initially came into existence in response to glacial conditions and became extinct with the onset of warmer climates. Tropical and subtropical areas have experienced less radical climatic change. The most dramatic of these changes was the transformation of a vast area of north Africa into the world's largest desert. Significantly, Africa escaped major faunal extinction as did tropical and sub-tropical Asia. The human exodus from Africa and our entrance into the Americas and Australia were also accompanied by climate change. Australia's climate changed from cold-dry to warm-dry. As a result, surface water became scarce. Most inland lakes became completely dry or dry in the warmer seasons. Most large, predominantly browsing animals lost their habitat and retreated to a narrow band in eastern Australia, where there was permanent water and better vegetation. Some animals may have survived until about 7000 years ago. If people have been in Australia for up to 60 000 years, then megafauna must have co-existed with humans for at least 30 000 years. Regularly hunted modem kangaroos survived not only 10 000 years of Aboriginal hunting, but also an onslaught of commercial shooters.
G. The group of scientists led by A.J. Stuart focused on northern Eurasia, which he was taking as Europe, plus Siberia, essentially, where they 've got the best data that animals became extinct in Europe during the Late Pleistocene. Some cold-adapted animals, go through into the last part of the cold stage, and then become extinct up there. So you've actually got two phases of extinction. Now, neither of these coincide — these are Neanderthals here being replaced by modem humans. There's no obvious coincidence between the arrival of humans or climatic change alone and these extinctions. There's a climatic change here, so there's a double effect here. Again, as animals come through to the last part of the cold stage, here there's a fundamental change in the climate, reorganization of vegetation, and the combination of the climatic change and the presence of humans -- of advanced Paleolithic humans — causes this wave of extinction. There's a profound difference between the North American data and that of Europe, which summarize that the extinctions in northern Eurasia, in Europe, are moderate and staggered, and in North America severe and sudden. And these things relate to the differences in the timing of human arrival. The extinctions follow from human predation, but only at times of fundamental changes in the environment.
Questions
Questions 28–32 Summary Completion
Complete the following summary of the paragraphs of Reading Passage, using no more than three words and/or a number from the Reading Passage for each answer.
Having been preserved well in Europe and central Asia, the remains of the Irish elk was initially found approximately 28. Around 29, they were driven to live in the plain after being restricted to the Ural Mountains. Hunting was considered as one of the important factors of Irish elk's extinction, people have not started hunting until 30 when Irish elk used to get through under a variety of climatic fluctuations.
The huge antlers may possibly contribute to the reason why Irish elk extinct, which was highly controversial as they live pleasantly over the span of 31. Generally, it is well-known that, at the last maximum ice age, mammals become extinct about 32.
Questions 33–35 Short Answers
Answer the questions below.
Choose NO MORE THAN THREE WORDS from the passage for each answer.
Questions 36–39 Matching Features
Matching choose the letter A-D
A. Eurasia
B. Australia
C. Asia
D. Africa
Questions 40–40 One Choice
Choose the correct letter, A, B, C or D.
Answers & Explanations Summary
| # | Answer | Evidence | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q28 | 400 000 years ago / 400,000 years ago | The Irish elk, so-called because its well-preserved remains are often found in lake sediments under peat bogs in Ireland, first appeared about 400,000 years ago in Europe and central Asia | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage states that the giant deer (Irish elk) first lived in Europe and central Asia about 400,000 years ago. Answer Explanation: The answer means 400,000 years before now. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is "400,000 years ago" because Paragraph B explains that the Irish elk first came into existence or appeared in Europe and central Asia around this time. The sentence in the text connects the animal's remains in these areas with the time frame of 400,000 years ago. |
| Q29 | 8 000 years ago / 8,000 years ago | The eastern foothills of the Urals became very densely forested about 8,000 years ago, which could have pushed them on to the plain | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that around 8,000 years ago, the area near the Urals grew many trees, which likely drove the giant deer to move onto the flat open land. Answer Explanation: The answer means around 8,000 years before the present time. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is '8000 years ago' because Paragraph C states that about 8,000 years ago, dense forests grew in the area near the Urals, which forced or 'pushed' the Irish elk out onto the 'plain'. |
| Q30 | 7 000 years ago / 7,000 years ago | We haven't got just hunting 7,000 years ago—this was also about the time the first Neolithic people settled in the region | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that human hunting was happening around 7,000 years ago, which was the same time early farmers came to live in that area. Answer Explanation: The answer means seven thousand years before today. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is "7000 years ago" because the text mentions that human hunting was taking place around 7,000 years ago, around the time the first farmers settled in the area, which added to the reasons why the giant deer could not survive. |
| Q31 | Wooded interglacials | But, Lister said, "That's a hard argument to make, because the deer previously survived perfectly well through wooded interglacials [warmer periods between ice ages]." | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that it is difficult to blame the giant deer's large antlers for its extinction, because the deer had already lived fine through past warm periods filled with trees. Answer Explanation: The answer means warmer periods between ice ages that were covered with trees. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is "Wooded interglacials" because paragraph E discusses the idea that the giant deer's huge antlers caused its extinction in dense forests. However, Professor Lister disagrees with this argument, pointing out that the deer had already lived without any problems during earlier "wooded interglacials" (warm times between ice ages when trees grew). Therefore, the idea is disputed because the deer successfully survived during these periods. |
| Q32 | 10 500 years ago / 10,500 years ago | Toothed cats, mastodons, giant sloths, woolly rhinos, and many other big, shaggy mammals are widely thought to have died out around the end of the last ice age, some 10,500 years ago | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage states that many kinds of large animals died and completely disappeared near the end of the last ice age, approximately 10,500 years ago. Answer Explanation: The answer means a point in time roughly 10,500 years in the past. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer fills in the sentence explaining when large mammals generally became extinct. The passage mentions right at the start that big, hairy mammals are commonly believed to have died out around the end of the last ice age, about 10,500 years ago. |
| Q33 | Male’s huge anlers | Meanwhile, Lister cast doubt on another possible explanation for the deer's demise—the male's huge antlers. Some scientists have suggested this exaggerated feature—the result of females preferring stags with the largest antlers, possibly because they advertised a male's fitness —contributed to the mammal's downfall | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says some scientists believed that the male deer's very big antlers were a body feature that helped cause the animal's death out (extinction). Answer Explanation: The answer refers to the very large horns (antlers) found on male Irish elk. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer points to the male deer's very large horns. Paragraph E explains that some researchers believed this body feature played a role in the animal's extinction ('demise' or 'downfall') because giant antlers were hard to move around in thick forests and required huge amounts of minerals to grow. |
| Q34 | Minerals | High amounts of calcium and phosphate compounds are required to form antlers, and therefore large quantities of these minerals are required for the massive structures of the Irish Elk | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that to grow antlers, the Irish elk needed a lot of calcium and phosphate. Because of this, it needed large amounts of these minerals to support its huge body parts. Answer Explanation: The answer refers to minerals, which are important elements or nutrients that living things need to grow and stay healthy. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is "Minerals" because section E explains that the giant deer needed huge amounts of calcium and phosphate to build its massive antlers. The text explicitly refers to these substances as "minerals" that were necessary for the animal's large structures. |
| Q35 | Habitat destruction | The team, though, said their new date for the Irish elk's extinction hints at an additional human-made problem—habitat destruction | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that researchers found evidence that humans caused another problem that led to the giant deer dying out, which was destroying their living area. Answer Explanation: The answer means the damage or loss of the natural living areas of animals caused by people. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is "Habitat destruction" because paragraph D explicitly states that the new date for the giant deer's extinction points to a human-made issue, which is habitat destruction. This happened when early human farmers settled in the area and cleared the land, making it difficult for the giant deer to survive. |
| Q36 | B | If people have been in Australia for up to 60 000 years, then megafauna must have co-existed with humans for at least 30 000 years. Regularly hunted modem kangaroos survived not only 10 000 years of Aboriginal hunting, but also an onslaught of commercial shooters | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage shows that humans lived together with large animals in Australia for tens of thousands of years, and animals survived a long history of human hunting. Answer Explanation: The answer is option B, which stands for Australia. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is B because paragraph F shows that in Australia, humans lived alongside giant animals (megafauna) for at least 30,000 years without driving them to extinction immediately. Even heavily hunted animals, like modern kangaroos, survived thousands of years of human hunting and shooting, proving that human activity had little impact on wiping them out. |
| Q37 | D | Tropical and subtropical areas have experienced less radical climatic change. The most dramatic of these changes was the transformation of a vast area of north Africa into the world's largest desert. Significantly, Africa escaped major faunal extinction as did tropical and sub-tropical Asia | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that warmer areas had less extreme weather changes, and because of this, Africa did not lose most of its animals. Answer Explanation: The answer D means Africa. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is D because Paragraph F states that warmer regions had less extreme ("less radical") climate changes and that Africa avoided ("escaped") large-scale animal loss ("major faunal extinction"). This matches the idea of a continent where climate change was mild and animals (fauna) survived. |
| Q38 | A | The group of scientists led by A.J. Stuart focused on northern Eurasia, which he was taking as Europe, plus Siberia, essentially, where they 've got the best data that animals became extinct in Europe during the Late Pleistocene Again, as animals come through to the last part of the cold stage, here there's a fundamental change in the climate, reorganization of vegetation, and the combination of the climatic change and the presence of humans -- of advanced Paleolithic humans — causes this wave of extinction |
Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage shows that researchers studied northern Eurasia and determined that animals died out there due to both climate change and the presence of humans working together. Answer Explanation: The answer A means Eurasia. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is A because Paragraph G discusses research on northern Eurasia. It states that animal extinctions in this region were caused by a double effect: weather shifts (climatic change) together with human activity and hunting (the presence of humans). |
| Q39 | C | Significantly, Africa escaped major faunal extinction as did tropical and sub-tropical Asia | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage states that both Africa and tropical and sub-tropical Asia avoided large-scale animal extinctions during periods of climate change. Answer Explanation: The answer choice C refers to Asia. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is C because the text mentions Asia in paragraph F when discussing climate changes and extinctions across different parts of the world. |
| Q40 | C | There's no obvious coincidence between the arrival of humans or climatic change alone and these extinctions | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that neither the arrival of people nor weather/climate change on its own caused the animals to disappear completely. Answer Explanation: The answer choice C means that climate change by itself was not the only reason why large animals died out in Europe. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is C because the text states that extinctions were not caused by climate change alone or human arrival alone. Instead, it was a combination of both climate changes and the presence of humans that caused the wave of animal extinctions in Europe. Keywords to pay attention to include 'climatic change alone' (meaning only climate change) and 'combination' (meaning multiple factors together). |
