The Power Of Light - IELTS Reading Answers & Explanations
From Oxford IELTS Practice Tests Academic Reading Test 4 · Part 1 · Questions 1–13
Reading Passage
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 1–13, which are based on Reading Passage 1.
The Power of Light
Light reveals the world to us. It sets our biological clocks. It triggers in our brains the sensations of colour. Light feeds us, supplying the energy for plants to grow. It inspires us with special effects like rainbows and sunsets. Light gives us life-changing tools, from incandescent bulbs to lasers and fibre optics.
There has been light from the beginning. There will be light, feebly, at the end. In all its forms, visible and invisible, it saturates the universe. Light is more than a little bit inscrutable. Modern physics has sliced the stuff of nature into ever smaller and more exotic constituents, but light won't reduce. Light is light – pure, but not simple. No one is quite sure how to describe it. A wave? A particle? Yes, the scientists say. Both.
It is a measure of light's importance in our daily lives that we hardly pay any attention to it. Light is almost like air. It's a given. A human would no more linger over the concept of light than a fish would ponder the notion of water. There are exceptions, certain moments of sudden appreciation when a particular manifestation of light, a transitory glory, appears: a rainbow, a sunset, a flash of lightning in a dark sky, the shimmering surface of the sea at twilight, the dappled light in a forest, the little red dot from a professor's laser pointer. The flicker of a candle, flooding a room with romance. The torch searching for the circuit breakers after a power cut.
Usually, though, we don't see light, we merely see with it. You can't appreciate the beauty of a rose if you ponder that the colour red is just the brain's interpretation of a specific wavelength of light with crests that are roughly 700 nanometres apart. A theatrical lighting director told me that she's doing her job best when no one notices the lights at all. Her goal is to create an atmosphere, a mood – not to show off the fancy new filters that create colours of startling intensity.
Light is now used for everything from laser eye surgery to telephone technology. It could even become the main power source for long-distance space travel. The spaceship would have an ultrathin sail to catch the 'wind' of light beamed from an Earth-based laser. In theory such a craft could accelerate to a sizeable fraction of the speed of light, without carrying fuel.
What we call light is really the same thing in a different set of wavelengths as the radiation that we call radio waves or gamma rays or x-rays. But visible light is unlike any other fundamental element of the universe: it directly, regularly and dramatically interacts with our senses. Light offers high-resolution information across great distances. You can't hear or smell the moons of Jupiter or the Crab Nebula. So much of vital importance is communicated by visible light that almost everything from a fly to an octopus has a way to capture it – an eye, eyes, or something similar.
It's worth noting that our eyes are designed to detect the kind of light that is radiated in abundance by the particular star that gives life to our planet: the sun. Visible light is powerful stuff, moving at relatively short wavelengths, which makes it biologically convenient. To see long, stretched-out radio waves, we'd have to have huge eyes like satellite dishes. Not worth the trouble! Nor would it make sense for our eyes to detect infrared light (though some deep-sea shrimp near hot springs do see this way). We'd be constantly distracted, because in these wavelengths any heat-emitting object glows. That would include almost everything around us.
There is also darkness in the daytime: shadows. There are many kinds of shadows, more than I realized until I consulted astronomer and shadow expert David Lynch in Topanga Canyon, up the coast from Santa Monica, California. Lynch points out that a shadow is filled with light reflected from the sky, otherwise it would be completely black. Black is the way shadows on the moon looked to the Apollo astronauts, because the moon has no atmosphere and thus no sky to bounce light into the unlit crannies of the lunar surface.
Lynch is a man who, when he looks at a rainbow, spots details that elude most of us. He knows, for example, that all rainbows come in pairs, and he always looks for the second rainbow: a faint, parallel rainbow, with the colours in reverse order. The intervening region is darker. That area has a name, wouldn't you know: Alexander's dark band. As I took in the spectacular view across the canyon, Lynch explained something else: 'the reason those mountains over there look a little blue,' he said, indicating the range that obscures the Pacific, 'is because there's sky between here and those mountains. It's called daylight.'
What next for light? What new application will we see? What orthodoxy-busting cosmic information will starlight deliver to our telescopes? Will the rotating disco ball ever make a dance-floor comeback? Above all, you have to wonder: will we ever fully understand light?
There have been recent headlines about scientists finding ways to make light go faster than the speed of light. This is what science fiction writers and certain overly imaginative folks have dreamed of for decades. If you could make a spaceship that wasn't bound by Einstein's speed limit, they fantasized, you could zip around the universe far more easily.
Lijun Wang, a research scientist at Princeton, managed to create a pulse of light that went faster than the supposed speed limit. 'We created an artificial medium of cesium gas in which the speed of a pulse of light exceeds the speed of light in a vacuum,' he said, 'but this is not at odds with Einstein.' Even though light can be manipulated to go faster than light, matter can't. Information can't. There's no possibility of time travel.
I asked Wang why light goes 186,282 miles a second and not some other speed. 'That's just the way nature is,' he said. There are scientists who don't like 'why' questions like this. The speed of light is just what it is. That's their belief. Whether light would move at a different velocity in a different universe is something that is currently outside the scope of experimental science. It's even a bit 'out there' for the theorists.
What's certain is that light is going to remain extremely useful for industry, science, art, and our daily, mundane comings and goings. Light permeates our reality at every scale of existence. It's an amazing tool, a carrier of beauty, a giver of life. I can't help but say that it has a very bright future.
Questions
Questions 1–5 Matching Features
Reading passage 3 describes a number of cause and effect relationships. Match each Cause (1–5) in List A, with its Effect (A–H) in List B.
There are more Effects in List B than you will need, so you will not use all of them.
A. Nearly all living creatures can detect it.
B. There is a dark gap between rainbows.
C. Light from Earth could power a spacecraft.
D. Shadows are totally black.
E. We cannot return to the past.
F. We don't really notice or think about it.
G. Certain creatures can detect infra-red light.
H. We instantly become aware of it.
Questions 6–10 Yes / No / Not Given
Do the following statements agree with the views of the writer in Reading Passage 1?
YES if the statement agrees with the views of the writer
NO if the statement does not agree with the views of the writer
NOT GIVEN if there is no information about this in the passage
Questions 11–13 Short Answers
Answer the following questions using NO MORE THAN THREE WORDS for each answer.
Answers & Explanations Summary
| # | Answer | Evidence | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | F | It is a measure of light's importance in our daily lives that we hardly pay any attention to it. Light is almost like air. It's a given. A human would no more linger over the concept of light than a fish would ponder the notion of water | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that light is everywhere around us like air, so humans rarely focus on it or think deeply about it, just as a fish does not think about water. Answer Explanation: The answer "F" means that people usually do not pay attention to light or think about it. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is F because the passage explains that since light is always present in our daily lives (just like air to humans or water to fish), we take it for granted. The author directly notes that we "hardly pay any attention to it" and would not "linger over" or "ponder" it, which means we do not really notice or think about it. |
| Q2 | H | There are exceptions, certain moments of sudden appreciation when a particular manifestation of light, a transitory glory, appears: a rainbow, a sunset, a flash of lightning in a dark sky, the shimmering surface of the sea at twilight, the dappled light in a forest, the little red dot from a professor's laser pointer | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that when light shows up in a special or beautiful form—like a sunset or a rainbow—people suddenly stop, notice it, and admire it right away. Answer Explanation: The answer "H" means that we quickly notice and pay attention to light. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is H because the passage explains that although we normally ignore light, there are exceptions when a special or beautiful form of light appears (such as a sunset or a rainbow) and we experience a moment of "sudden appreciation." In this context, "a particular manifestation of light, a transitory glory, appears" matches the cause "Light can sometimes appear in an interesting way," and "moments of sudden appreciation" matches the effect "We instantly become aware of it." |
| Q3 | A | So much of vital importance is communicated by visible light that almost everything from a fly to an octopus has a way to capture it – an eye, eyes, or something similar | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that because light carries so much important information, almost every animal, from tiny insects to sea creatures, has eyes or similar body parts to detect and see that light. Answer Explanation: The answer "A" means that almost all animals and living beings have organs, like eyes, to sense or see light. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is A because the passage explains a cause-and-effect relationship between the important information carried by light and animals having the ability to sense it. In the text, "vital importance" corresponds to "essential information," and "communicated" corresponds to "carries." As a result (the effect), "almost everything from a fly to an octopus has a way to capture it," which means "Nearly all living creatures can detect it." |
| Q4 | D | Lynch points out that a shadow is filled with light reflected from the sky, otherwise it would be completely black. Black is the way shadows on the moon looked to the Apollo astronauts, because the moon has no atmosphere and thus no sky to bounce light into the unlit crannies of the lunar surface | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that shadows have some light in them because the sky reflects light. When a place like the moon has no atmosphere, there is no sky to bounce light into shaded areas, so the shadows look completely black. Answer Explanation: The answer "D" means that shadows become completely black without any light. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is D because the passage explains the cause-and-effect relationship between an atmosphere reflecting light and the appearance of shadows. According to paragraph 8, shadows normally receive light bounced from the sky; without an atmosphere or sky to bounce light, shadows appear completely black, as seen on the moon. Therefore, the effect of light not being reflected onto solid surfaces (due to lack of atmosphere) is that "Shadows are totally black." Key phrases to notice are "otherwise it would be completely black" and "because the moon has no atmosphere and thus no sky to bounce light". |
| Q5 | E | Even though light can be manipulated to go faster than light, matter can't. Information can't. There's no possibility of time travel | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that only light can be made to travel faster than light itself, while physical matter and data cannot, which makes travelling through time impossible. Answer Explanation: The answer 'E' means that travelling back in time is impossible. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is E because the passage explains that although a pulse of light can be made to exceed the normal speed limit of light (186,282 miles per second), matter and information cannot do so. As a direct result (effect) of this limitation, time travel is impossible, meaning we cannot go back to the past. |
| Q6 | YES | Light is light – pure, but not simple. No one is quite sure how to describe it. A wave? A particle? Yes, the scientists say. Both | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that light is not simple to describe, and scientists must use multiple words—both "wave" and "particle"—to define it. Answer Explanation: The answer "YES" means that it is hard to use just one word to describe what light is. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is YES because the author states that light is "not simple" and "No one is quite sure how to describe it." When asking if light is a "wave" or a "particle", scientists reply that it is "Both", showing that a single word cannot fully describe what light is. Therefore, the statement agrees with the writer's view. |
| Q7 | NO | You can't appreciate the beauty of a rose if you ponder that the colour red is just the brain's interpretation of a specific wavelength of light with crests that are roughly 700 nanometres apart | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that if you focus on the scientific and physical details of light, like wavelengths and measurements, you are unable to enjoy the natural beauty of a rose. Answer Explanation: The answer "NO" means that the statement contradicts what the writer says in the text. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is "NO" because the passage explicitly states that thinking deeply about the scientific physics of light prevents someone from enjoying its beauty. The author writes that you "can't appreciate the beauty of a rose if you ponder that the colour red is just the brain's interpretation of a specific wavelength of light". Since the statement claims that thinking about the physics of light makes things seem "even more beautiful", it directly opposes the writer's point. |
| Q8 | NOT GIVEN | It's worth noting that our eyes are designed to detect the kind of light that is radiated in abundance by the particular star that gives life to our planet: the sun | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that the sun is the star that provides life to our own planet, Earth. It says nothing about life existing on other planets because of sunlight. Answer Explanation: The answer "NOT GIVEN" means that the passage does not provide any information about whether sunlight allows life to exist on other planets. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is NOT GIVEN because the passage only mentions that the sun gives life to "our planet" (Earth). The author never states or discusses whether sunlight makes life possible on other planets. Because there is no information in the text to confirm or deny this statement, the answer must be NOT GIVEN. |
| Q9 | YES | Visible light is powerful stuff, moving at relatively short wavelengths, which makes it biologically convenient. To see long, stretched-out radio waves, we'd have to have huge eyes like satellite dishes. Not worth the trouble | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that seeing visible light works well for our bodies, whereas seeing long radio waves would require human eyes to be as huge as satellite dishes, which is completely impractical. Answer Explanation: The answer "YES" means that the writer agrees that seeing visible light is much more useful and convenient for humans than seeing radio waves. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is YES because paragraph 7 states that visible light has short wavelengths that make it "biologically convenient" (practical for living bodies). In contrast, seeing radio waves would require humans to have giant eyes like satellite dishes, which the writer says is "Not worth the trouble!" Therefore, detecting visible light is indeed far more practical than detecting radio waves. |
| Q10 | YES | Lynch is a man who, when he looks at a rainbow, spots details that elude most of us | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that when David Lynch observes a rainbow, he sees small features and details that most people do not see or fail to catch. Answer Explanation: The answer "YES" means that the statement accurately reflects what the writer says in the text. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is YES because the passage clearly states that David Lynch sees things in a rainbow that most other people fail to see. In the text, the phrase "spots details" means "notices things", and "elude most of us" means other people do not notice or miss them. Because this directly matches the statement that Lynch notices things other people do not, the correct choice is YES. |
| Q11 | a little blue | 'the reason those mountains over there look a little blue,' he said, indicating the range that obscures the Pacific, 'is because there's sky between here and those mountains | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that distant mountains appear slightly blue because of the daylight and sky in between the viewer and the mountains. Answer Explanation: The answer means that the land or mountains can look slightly blue in colour when viewed from far away. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is supported by the conversation between the author and David Lynch in paragraph 9. When looking across a canyon at a distant mountain range ("mountains over there"), Lynch explains why they "look a little blue". Here, the "mountains" represent the "land" seen from a distance, and their appearance is described as "a little blue". |
| Q12 | a spaceship | If you could make a spaceship that wasn't bound by Einstein's speed limit, they fantasized, you could zip around the universe far more easily | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that people imagined building a spaceship that could move faster than normal limits so that they could travel across space easily. Answer Explanation: The answer "a spaceship" refers to a vehicle designed for travel in space beyond the Earth. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is supported by the text in paragraph 11, which talks about what imaginative people and science fiction writers have dreamed of. The text mentions that they "fantasized" (imagined) that if one could build "a spaceship" that could go faster than the speed of light, people could "zip around" (travel around) the universe much more easily. |
| Q13 | cesium gas / caesium gas | 'We created an artificial medium of cesium gas in which the speed of a pulse of light exceeds the speed of light in a vacuum,' he said, 'but this is not at odds with Einstein.' | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage states directly that researchers used a medium made of cesium gas to produce a pulse of light that travelled faster than the speed of light in a vacuum. Answer Explanation: The answer refers to "cesium gas", which is the specific material or medium used by scientists to make a pulse of light travel faster than its usual speed limit. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is supported by the twelfth paragraph, where the text discusses scientists making light travel faster than the standard speed limit. Scientist Lijun Wang explains that they made light exceed this speed inside an "artificial medium of cesium gas". Therefore, "cesium gas" is the substance in which this occurred. |
