The Romans Reveal Their Secrets - IELTS Reading Answers & Explanations
From IELTS Trainer 2 Academic Reading Test 4 · Part 1 · Questions 1–13
Reading Passage
Read the text below and answer questions 1-13.
The Romans Reveal their Secrets
As Katherine Sheen rested on the banks of Hensham river on 3 August 2005, her gaze fell upon a small dirt-covered object amongst a tangle of tree roots. Cleaning away the soil, she realized it was a leather pouch. It fell apart as Katherine opened it, and the items inside fell to the ground. Although her university degree merely touched on the Roman occupation of ancient Britain, providing a very general overview of everyday activities, once she’d rubbed off some the dirt, Katherine immediately identified the coins in her hand as coming from that era. Despite their discoloration, Katherine had no doubt they were historically significant. As soon as she got home, she informed the police of her find.
That might have been the end of the story – except for the fact that the farmer who owned adjacent field then mentioned the lines of large stones his plough kept running into. By mid-August, with the farmer’s permission, a team of archaeologists, led by Professor Kevin Durrand, were camped out in the field. Durrand had previously worked on other projects where pieces of ancient pottery and the discovery of an old sword had led archaeologists to unearth sizeable Roman settlements. He was keen to start excavations at Hensham, and had got funding for a three-month dig. What his team eventually discovered, three weeks into excavations, were the remains of the outer walls of a Roman villa. As many Romans in Britain simply lived in wooden houses with thatched roofs, the family that occupied the villa must have been very wealthy. As the team continued their work, they looked for evidence that might indicated whether the villa had been attacked and purposely demolished, or fallen into such a poor state that it eventually collapsed. Looking at the way a set of slate roof tiles had fallen to the ground, they decided on the latter. What caused the noble Roman family and their servants to abandon the villa remains open to speculation. Another find was six blue beads, crafted from glass, which the archaeologists speculated were part of a necklace. Durrand has previously found gold bracelets on other sites, but for him the beads are no less significant. ‘Every find contributes to the story’, he says.
On the outer western wall, the archaeologists uncovered number of foundation stones. On one is carved what the archaeologists made out to be a Latin inscription. But as the stone itself has endured centuries of erosion, the team has yet to work out what it says. Another find was a section of traditional Roman mosaic. Although incomplete, enough pieces remain to show a geometrical pattern and stylized fish. From this, Durrand assumes that a bath house would have been a feature of the villa. While his team have so far not found any hard proof of this, Durrand is confident it will turn out to be the case.
Something that team particularly excited about is evidence of a heating system, which would have served the Roman family and their visitors well in winter months. Although much of the system has long since crumbled at Hensham, Durrand and his team believe it would have been based on a typical Roman hypocaust; they have created a model for visitors to see. The furnace that produced the hot air needed to be kept burning all the time, a task that would have fallen to the villa’s slaves. As large branches would have taken too long to produce the heat required, it is more likely that twigs would have been gathered from surrounding woodland instead. Another fuel source used in some Roman hypocausts was charcoal, but evidence for this at Hensham ha not presented itself. The underfloor space was made by setting the floor on top of piles of square stones. Known as pilae, these stones stood approximately two feet high. The gap this created meant that the hot air coming out of the furnace was not trapped and restricted. Instead its distribution around the pilae and under the floor was free flowing. Floor tiles were not placed directly onto the pilae but separated by a layer of concrete, or at least a primitive version of it. This would have made the whole structure more solid, and helped reduce the risk of fire spreading to upper levels. The walls of the rooms above heating system were made of bricks, but the key point here is that they were hollow, in order to allow heat to rise around the rooms and provide insulation. Some have been recovered from the Hensham villa and are now undergoing preservation treatment.
Another feature of the heating system that archaeologists have identified at Hensham was its clay pipes. These were cleverly built into the wall so as not to take up space. The principal reason for including the pipes was to let out air through a vent in the roof once it had cooled down. What the Romans may not have realised, however, was that gas produced by the burning fuel was expelled in this way too. In high doses, it could have been lethal if it had leaked into the upper levels. Inside the rooms in the villa, a layer of plaster would have been applied to the walls and painted in rich colours. Sadly, none of the original plaster at Hensham still exists. However, some of the tiles that the family would have walked on have survived. They would certainly have felt warm underfoot and helped generate an indoor climate that the family could relax in. In its day, the Hensham hypocaust would have been a remarkable piece of engineering.
Questions
Questions 1–7 True / False / Not Given
Do the following statements agree with the information given in Reading Passage 1?
TRUE If the statement agrees with the information
FALSE If the statement contradicts the information
NOT GIVEN If there is no information on this
Questions 8–13 Diagram Labeling
Label the diagram below.
Choose NO MORE THAN TWO WORDS from the passage for each answer.

Answers & Explanations Summary
| # | Answer | Evidence | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | TRUE | Although her university degree merely touched on the Roman occupation of ancient Britain, providing a very general overview of everyday activities, once she’d rubbed off some the dirt, Katherine immediately identified the coins in her hand as coming from that era | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage states that Katherine's university degree briefly mentioned the Roman time in Britain and only gave a basic summary of what daily life was like. Answer Explanation: The answer is TRUE because Katherine Sheen's studies at university did not go into much detail about the way Romans lived in Britain. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is TRUE because the text explains that Katherine's university degree only 'merely touched on' the Roman occupation of Britain. This phrase, along with 'very general overview,' shows that her course only looked at this subject briefly and lacked deep or specific details about Roman life. |
| Q2 | NOT GIVEN | Katherine immediately identified the coins in her hand as coming from that era. Despite their discoloration, Katherine had no doubt they were historically significant | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that Katherine knew the coins were very old and important for our knowledge of the past (historically significant), but it says nothing about whether she thought they were worth a lot of money (financially valuable). Answer Explanation: The answer is NOT GIVEN because the passage does not mention whether Katherine Sheen thought the items in the pouch were worth a lot of money. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is NOT GIVEN because while the text mentions that Katherine identified the coins as "historically significant," it never states her opinion on their financial or monetary value. A discovery can be important for history without necessarily being worth a large amount of money, and the text does not provide enough information to confirm her thoughts on their price. |
| Q3 | NOT GIVEN | He was keen to start excavations at Hensham, and had got funding for a three-month dig | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that Durrand was excited to begin the project and had formal support for it, but it does not explain what he thought the result would be. Answer Explanation: The answer means that the text does not tell us what Kevin Durrand expected to find before the digging began. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is NOT GIVEN because the passage only mentions that Kevin Durrand was 'keen' (meaning eager or excited) to start the work at Hensham and had the money to do it. It mentions that he found settlements in his past projects, but it never clearly states what he personally believed or expected to find at this specific location before the excavation started. |
| Q4 | FALSE | As the team continued their work, they looked for evidence that might indicated whether the villa had been attacked and purposely demolished, or fallen into such a poor state that it eventually collapsed. Looking at the way a set of slate roof tiles had fallen to the ground, they decided on the latter | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that the team compared two ideas: the house being attacked and destroyed, or it falling down because it was old. By saying they 'decided on the latter,' it means they chose the second idea, which is that the house fell down on its own. Answer Explanation: The answer means that the scientists did not believe the building was broken on purpose by people; instead, they believed it fell down because it became very old and weak. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is FALSE because the text notes that the researchers looked for evidence to see if the villa was 'purposely demolished' (deliberately destroyed) or if it 'eventually collapsed' because it was in a 'poor state' (old and broken). The passage confirms that they 'decided on the latter,' meaning they chose the second option: that it fell down naturally rather than being destroyed by people. |
| Q5 | NOT GIVEN | Another find was six blue beads, crafted from glass, which the archaeologists speculated were part of a necklace | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that the team found six blue glass beads that they think belonged to a necklace, but it says nothing about who the owner was. Answer Explanation: The answer is NOT GIVEN because the text does not tell us who owned the beads or what their social rank was. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is NOT GIVEN because while the passage confirms that blue glass beads were found and that they likely belonged to a necklace, it provides no information about the person who wore them. It does not mention if the owner was a woman, nor does it describe her social status (her level of importance or wealth). |
| Q6 | FALSE | But as the stone itself has endured centuries of erosion, the team has yet to work out what it says | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that because the stone has been worn away over a very long time, the group of scientists does not know what the writing means yet. Answer Explanation: The answer is FALSE, which means the statement about the archaeologists understanding the writing is incorrect according to the text. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is FALSE because the passage explicitly states that the archaeologists have not yet figured out the meaning of the Latin words. Although they identified the writing, the stone has been damaged by weather and time (erosion), making it impossible for the team to read it at this point. Pay attention to the phrase 'yet to work out', which means they haven't finished or succeeded in doing it yet. |
| Q7 | TRUE | Another find was a section of traditional Roman mosaic. Although incomplete, enough pieces remain to show a geometrical pattern and stylized fish. From this, Durrand assumes that a bath house would have been a feature of the villa | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that the researchers found part of a decorated floor (a mosaic) with pictures of fish on it. Because of these fish drawings, the leader of the dig, Durrand, believes that the building likely had a special room for bathing. Answer Explanation: The answer is TRUE because the text confirms that Professor Durrand believes the found mosaic pattern indicates the presence of a bath house at the site. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is TRUE because the passage explicitly states that because of the mosaic pieces found—which showed a pattern including fish—Durrand thinks (or 'assumes') that a bath house was part of the villa. Even though they haven't found the actual bath house yet, he is 'confident' that this piece of floor decoration is a sign that one exists. The word 'assumes' in the text matches the idea of him having an 'opinion' or finding a 'suggestion' in the evidence. |
| Q8 | twigs | As large branches would have taken too long to produce the heat required, it is more likely that twigs would have been gathered from surrounding woodland instead | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that because large pieces of wood were too slow to create heat, it is probable that small sticks, or twigs, were collected from the nearby woods to be used instead. Answer Explanation: The answer is small, thin sticks or branches from trees. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is "twigs" because the passage identifies them as the most likely fuel for the villa's furnace. The text explains that big branches took too much time to get hot. Because the fire had to stay burning constantly, workers probably collected these smaller pieces of wood from the nearby forest to keep the heating system working efficiently. |
| Q9 | distribution | Instead its distribution around the pilae and under the floor was free flowing | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that the space under the floor allowed the hot air to spread out easily (distribution) around the stone piles instead of being stuck in one place. Answer Explanation: The answer refers to the way that hot air spreads out or moves through a specific area. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is "distribution" because the text describes how the hot air from the furnace was able to move through the space under the floor. This movement or spreading out of the air around the stone supports (pilae) is called its "distribution." The passage mentions that this process was "free flowing," meaning the air could spread everywhere easily to heat the floor. |
| Q10 | concrete | Floor tiles were not placed directly onto the pilae but separated by a layer of concrete, or at least a primitive version of it | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that the floor tiles were not put right on top of the stone piles; instead, a layer of concrete was put in between them. Answer Explanation: The answer refers to a building material used as a middle layer to support the floor in the Roman heating system. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is confirmed by the text's description of how the heating system (hypocaust) was built. Between the support stones (called pilae) and the tiles of the floor, the Romans used a layer of concrete. This made the structure stronger and helped prevent fireplace heat from causing fires in the rooms above. The passage uses the phrase 'separated by a layer of' to show where this material was placed. |
| Q11 | hollow bricks | The walls of the rooms above heating system were made of bricks, but the key point here is that they were hollow, in order to allow heat to rise around the rooms and provide insulation | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that the walls were made of bricks with empty space inside (hollow) so that hot air could move up and keep the rooms warm. Answer Explanation: The answer refers to bricks used in the walls that have empty space inside them to help move heat. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is found in the description of how the Romans heated their houses at Hensham. The passage explains that the walls above the furnace were built using bricks that were 'hollow.' This empty space inside the bricks was important because it allowed the hot air to travel up through the walls, making the rooms warm. |
| Q12 | gas | The principal reason for including the pipes was to let out air through a vent in the roof once it had cooled down. What the Romans may not have realised, however, was that gas produced by the burning fuel was expelled in this way too | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage explains that pipes in the wall let air leave through a hole in the roof. It also says that gas made by burning fuel was sent out of the building through these same pipes. Answer Explanation: The answer "gas" refers to the substance created when fuel is burned, which was let out of the building through pipes. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is derived from the description of the Roman heating system's ventilation. The passage explains that while the pipes were mainly for cooling air to escape, they also served to carry away the "gas" produced by the fire. This gas was "expelled" (sent out) through a vent in the roof. |
| Q13 | indoor climate | They would certainly have felt warm underfoot and helped generate an indoor climate that the family could relax in | Excerpt/Passage Explanation: The passage says that the floor tiles were warm, and this made the inside of the home a comfortable place for people to spend time and rest. Answer Explanation: The answer refers to the temperature and the general feel of the air inside the building. Reason For Correctness: The correct answer is found in the final paragraph of the text. It explains the benefits of the heating system's warm floor tiles. These tiles were important because they helped create a comfortable 'indoor climate,' which is a synonym for the atmosphere or conditions inside the house, making it a nice place for the family to spend time. |
