Table

Band 7+: Part 1 You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. Write at least 150 words. The first table below shows changes in the total population of New York City from 1800 to 2000. The second and third tables show changes in the population of the five districts of the city (Manhattan, Brooklyn, Bronx, Queens, Staten Island) over the same period. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

See all user-written answers on this topic

Image for topic: Part 1 You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. Write at least 150 words. The first table below shows changes in the total population of New York City from 1800 to 2000. The second and third tables show changes in the population of the five districts of the city (Manhattan, Brooklyn, Bronx, Queens, Staten Island) over the same period. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.

The image contains three tables detailing population changes. For New York City (all five districts), the total population was 79,216 in 1800, 3,437,202 in 1900, and 8,009,185 in 2000. In Manhattan, the population in 1800 was 60,515, which was 76% of the total population; in 1900, it was 1,850,093 (54%); and in 2000, it was 1,538,096 (19%). For the other districts (Brooklyn, Bronx, Queens, Staten Island), the combined population in 1800 was 18,701 (24% of total); in 1900, it was 1,587,109 (46%); and in 2000, it was 6,471,089 (81%).

Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.

Skyrocket your IELTS band score by 1-2 points in under a month with our premium plan!

Check it out

Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The tables represent the changes in the total population of New York City between 1800 and 2000.

Overall, it can be observed that the population rose significantly in this city over the decades. In terms of proportion, Manhattan district fell drastically, while other districts experienced a stong increase.

In 1980, Manhattan district accounted for 60,515 residents out of 79,216 total population, which was 76%, whereas all remaining districts combined had around one-fourth of them. After a decade, the total population grew considerably to almost 3.5 million. Although the number of people in Manhattan reached nearly 1.8 million, its proportion reduced to 54%. Conversely, other districts approximately doubled their percentage to 46%, and the count of individuals was nearly 1.6 million.

In 2000, there was a notable growth in the population, standing at 8 million. Brooklyn, Bronx, Queens, and staten island recorded the largest share of the total population, which was just above four-fifths. Manhattan, on the other hand, did not only see a decrease in numbers but also in proportion, which were 1,538,056 and 19% respectively.

Word Count: 176

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Check My Answer

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Generate A Sample

Overall Band Score

(+/- 0.5)

Vocabulary Complexity:
C1 - Intricate
Strive to incorporate even richer and more precise language.

Grammar Mistakes: N/A

Vocabulary Repetition:

population: 6

total: 4

manhattan: 4

proportion: 3

other: 3

districts: 3

which: 3

million: 3

Try using synonyms for the above words

Task Response

The report effectively addresses the task by describing the population changes in New York City from 1800 to 2000, with a clear overview and comparisons between Manhattan and the other districts. The overall trend of population growth and the shift in proportion are well highlighted. However, there are some inaccuracies and omissions: the year '1980' is incorrectly used instead of '1800', and the population figure for Manhattan in 2000 is slightly off (1,538,056 vs. 1,538,096). Additionally, the report could benefit from more precise data presentation and smoother transitions between time periods. To improve, ensure all years and figures are accurate, and consider using more varied vocabulary to describe changes.

Coherence & Cohesion

The report is generally well-organized with a clear overall structure, including an introduction, an overview, and detailed paragraphs. The use of cohesive devices like 'Overall', 'In terms of proportion', 'Conversely', and 'On the other hand' helps guide the reader. However, there are minor lapses in coherence, such as the abrupt shift from 'In 1980' (which should be 1800) to 'After a decade' (which should be a century), which may cause slight confusion. Paragraphing is adequate but could be more skillfully managed to separate the overview from the detailed analysis more distinctly.

Lexical Resource

The vocabulary used is appropriate and shows some flexibility, with terms like 'accounted for', 'notable growth', and 'largest share'. However, there are a few inaccuracies and less natural choices, such as 'stong increase' (spelling error) and 'fell drastically' (which could be more precise). The range of vocabulary is good but not fully sophisticated, and some phrasing could be more natural (e.g., 'the count of individuals' instead of 'the number of people'). Overall, lexical control is adequate but not at the highest level.

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

The report demonstrates a good range of grammatical structures, including complex sentences and comparative forms. However, there are several errors and inaccuracies: 'stong' should be 'strong', 'In 1980' should be 'In 1800', 'After a decade' should be 'After a century', and 'staten island' should be capitalized as 'Staten Island'. Additionally, the phrase 'did not only see a decrease in numbers but also in proportion' is awkwardly constructed. Punctuation is mostly correct, but these errors prevent the grammar from being fully accurate and controlled.

Answers On The Same Topic:

See All

The table below shows information about public funding for different arts sectors in the UK in 2010 and 2020. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The table illustrates about funds given by public to different five arts sectors in the United Kingdom between 2010 and 2020 as well as change in percentage. In terms of visual arts such as exhibitions and projects, that category registered most growth in funding than other sectors from 120 million pounds to 145.5 million pounds […]

Band 6+

The tables below show the working time of males and females in different regions in the year 2002. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The first table illustrate the average number of hours employees working full-time jobs in 2002 in different regions among both genders, while the second table show the average figure for hours for part-time workers. Overall, it is clear that Greece recorded the highest amount of time devoted to full-time jobs among both women and men […]

Band 7+

The table below shows the percentage of patients saying the service was very good.

The table illustrates the proportion of clients who had satisfaction with four aspects of three hospitals. Overall, it is clear that Hospital A, where achieved the most satisfactioin in the quality of treatment, while the Hospital C, where dominated with their staff. Furthermore, Hospital B’s patients were experienced equal satisfaction with waiting time. Looking first […]

Band 5+

The table shows percentage of students giving good ratings for different aspects of a university in China in 2000, 2005, 2010.

The table shows the proportion of learners giving positive feedback for 5 academic fields of a university in china in 3 years 2000,2005 and 2010 Overall, the percentage of students giving good responses for electronic resources rose significantly, whereas technical quality was more slightly. Moreover, print resources was always the highest category but range of […]

Band 7+

The table below shows information about public funding for different arts sectors in the UK in 2010 and 2020. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The table gives data about public funding for arts sectors in the United Kingdom in 2010 and 2020. Overall, museums and galleries had the largest funding, while literature had the smallest one . Visual arts had the highest percentage change, whereas the theatre and performing arts had the lowest. In 2010, museums and galleries received […]

Band 6+

the table below shows the percentage of mobile phone owners using various mobile features

The table displays the proportion of mobile phone possessors who used various cellphone features from 2006 to 2010. Overall, it is clear that the popularity of all mobile phone features grew over the years, making phone calls the most dominant feature throughout the timeframe. Moreover, cellphones were usually used for making calls; in stark contrast, […]

Band 8+

See All