The presented bar chart depicts percentages regarding the amount of physical activities did by employees in a week, while the table shows data on the attendance performance of the workers in two departments of a major company on 2012.
Looking at the bar chart, generally the range of employee’s exercise duration in both divisions were started from less than 5 hours to more than 15 hours per week. The employee of the Birmingham and London department’s had pretty much the same percentage of workers who engaged in physical activities for between 5 and 10 hours; the former with 50% and the latter with around 48% per week. However, London division did better with the amount of workers who exercise for less than 5 hours, with the exact number of 35%, compare to Birmingham division with only 15% of workers. On the other hand, working out for more than 15 hours each week considered as the least favorite with small differences between both divisions; with 10% for Birmingham and more than 5% for London.
The table indicates the number of workers absence due to sickness. It shows that Birmingham performed better compare to London for three different aspects, ranging from No Absenteeism category, did not work between 1-5 days a year, and did not went to office for more than 5 days a year. In comparison to the London department, which had only 158 out of 1,000 employees with no absenteeism, Birmingham had a higher number, with 380 workers who were never absent. Moreover, London division also performed worse than Birmingham for the number of its workers who were not presence between 1-5 days in a year, where there were 594 for the former, and 378 for the latter. Nevertheless, both reported similar number of their workers who did not attend to the workplace, with nearly 250 for each.
Overall, most employees in both departments did excersice between 5 to 10 hours in a week. In terms of the worker’s presence related to sickness, the Birmingham performed better compare to London.