🔥 Today Only: Save 30% on Premium — Offer Ends Soon! - Upgrade Now!
Bar Chart

Band 7+: The chart below shows the percentages of different types of household waste that were recycled in one city between 1992 and 2002. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Image for topic: The chart below shows the percentages of different types of household waste that were recycled in one city between 1992 and 2002. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.
The image displays percentages of four types of household waste recycled in 1992, 1997, and 2002. For plastic: 1992 has approximately 5%, 1997 close to 10%, and 2002 near 10%. For cans: 1992 shows about 10%, 1997 around 15%, and 2002 reaches approximately 25%. For paper: 1992 indicates around 15%, 1997 close to 20%, and 2002 approximately 50%. For glass: 1992 highlights 40%, 1997 roughly 25%, and 2002 about 30%.
Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.
Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The depicted bar chart compares data regarding the proportion of recycling diverse household waste, including plastics, cans, papers, and glass in a specific region during three different years: 1992, 1997, and 2002.

Overall, while the highest rate of recycling was allocated to glass and paper, the lowest proportion in the four categories was dedicated to plastic. Besides, the last year was the most successful in recycling.

To begin with, glass was the most common material for reprocessing. From 17% in 1992, recycling of glass reached 28% in 1997, before peaking at 48% in 2002. Similarly, reusing consumed papers was at the second highest rate with 25% in 1992, reaching just above 30% in 1997, prior to soaring to 38% in 2002.

In contrast, recycling cans and plastics were at a lower level. Although the percentage of recycling cans was the same as for glass, it dropped to 12% in 1997. However, This number again increased to 24% in 2002. Likewise, reusing plastic waste was at its lowest point, starting at 10% and remaining unchanged at 11% in 1997 and 2002.

Word Count: 180

Answers On The Same Topic:

The chart below shows the percentages of different types of household waste that were recycled in one city between 1992 and 2002. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line chart provides information regarding the proportions of four distinct recycled household waste in a particular city from 1992 to 2002. Overall, it is evident that with the exception of plastic, the other three types: paper, glass, and cans, were recorded at nearly similar figures initially. However, glass was the most prevalent type of […]

The chart below shows the percentages of different types of household waste that were recycled in one city between 1992 and 2002. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar graph provides information regarding the proportion of various types of recycled household waste: the plastic, the paper, the glass and the cans, in a particular city, from 1992 to 2002. Overall, there was an increasing trend for all figures, albeit to different trajectories. Notably, glass was the dominant figure throughout the period, closely […]

The chart below shows the percentages of different types of household waste that were recycled in one city between 1992 and 2002. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given chart demonstrates the proportion of six types of household waste that were reused in one city from 1992 to 2002. Overall, the ratio of waste recycled saw an upward trend. Furthermore, recycled glass took the lion’s share in 3 years. While, plastic was the smallest reused item. It can be seen that in […]

The chart below shows the percentages of different types of household waste that were recycled in one city between 1992 and 2002. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The data above displays the proportion of variety of types of residences’s wastes that were recycled in one town from 1992 to 2002 Overall, the bar chart represents that as the year increases the percentage of reprocessed wastes increases First and foremost, the most percentage of household waste recycled in the graph above is Glass […]

The chart below shows the percentages of different types of household waste that were recycled in one city between 1992 and 2002. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The chart depicts the proportion of various categories of household waste which is recycled in one particular country from 1992 to 2002 Overall the percentage of recycling material was height in 2002 in every category. However plastic is only items that was remain stable in every year. In terms of glass almost 50 percent of […]

See All

Other Topics:

The bar chart below shows the percentages of students who found employment in Molovia in 1995, and 2000.

The given bar chart depicts proportion of students who within 6 months of graduation employed over seven various faculties, in the years 1995 and 2005 in Molovia. Overall, computer Science students remained prominent in both years with highest percentages. In contrast, Arts students got the lowest employment over the studied years. During the year 1995, […]

'The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restorants between 2003 and 2013.

The bar chart illustrates the frequency od eating at fast food restaurants among individuals in the USA in 2003, 2006 and 2013. Overall, it can be seen that people tend to consume fast food once a week or once/twice a month in all three years. While individuals usually ate in fast food restaurants once a […]

The chart below shows the amount of energy generated from wind in four countries from 1985 to 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart compares the proportion of energy obtained from wind in four countries between 1985 and 2000. Overall, the production of electricity rose over the years in all the countries, especially in Denmark and India, where it multiplied more than sixfold. Of particular note, United States, the leading country for approximately 10 years, and […]

the graph below shows the amount of energy generated wind in four countries in the period 1980-2000

The diagramm illustrates the total of wind power produced in India, Denmark, Germany and US in 1985, 1990, 1995 and 2000. It is clear that, US was the major producer of wind energy untill 1995, whereas Denmark overcome every country in generating of reliable energy by 2000. Overall, all four countries increased its amount of […]

The following bar chart shows the share in modes of transport in 2014 of three cities: New York, Sydney and Hong Kong. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart illustrates the percentage of transportation using in three cities: New York, Sydney and Hong Kong in 2014. Overall, private transport was the vast majority transportation using by populations in Sydney, while people chose to travel by bus more than other ways in Hong Kong. In New York, walking was the most popular […]

The chart below shows the number of immigrants to Germany by region in 2010 and 2020. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

The bar chart compares the number of immigrants to Germany by region in one decade started in 2000. Overall, a glance at the chart reveals that the higher number of germans visited to Europe and America in the first year while the lowest number of Germans went to South Asia in two years. Furthermore, in […]

See All
We have detected unusual activity on your device.
Please verify your identity to continue.
Note: This verification step won't sign you in. If you have a premium account, please log in to access the service as usual.
Google/Gmail Verification
Or verify using Email/Code
We've sent a verification code to:
youremail@gmail.com (Not your email?)
Enter it below to complete the verification process.
Ensure your email address is correct, your inbox is not full, and you check your spam folder. If no email arrives, consider using an alternative email.
You will need a Premium plan to perform your action!
Note: If you already have a premium account, please log in to access our services as usual.

Plans & Pricing

Our mission is to make quality education accessible for everyone.
However, to keep our hardworking team running and this service alive, we genuinely need your support!
By opting for a premium plan, not only do you sustain us in achieving the mission, but you also unlock advanced features to enrich your learning experience.

Free

For learners who aren't pressed for time

What's included on Free
100+ Cambridge IELTS Tests
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation (2 times/month)
Instant IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation (5 times/month)
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator (2 times/month)
500+ Dictation & Shadowing Exercises
100+ Pronunciation Exercises
Flashcards
Other Advanced Tools

Premium

For those serious about advancing their English proficiency, and for IELTS candidates aspiring to boost their band score by 1-2 points (especially in writing & speaking) in just 30 days or less

What's included on Premium
Save Your IELTS Test Progress
Unlock All Courses & IELTS Tests
Unlimited AI Conversations
Unlimited AI Writing Enhancement Exercises
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation
Checked Answers Will Not Be Published
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Sample Generator
Unlimited Usage Of Advanced Tools
Priority Support within 24h (12-month plan only)

Due to the nature of our service and the provided free trials, payments are non-refundable.
Nếu bạn là người Việt Nam và không có hoặc không muốn trả bằng credit/debit cards, bạn có thể thanh toán bằng phương thức chuyển khoản:



Chọn gói:
419,000₫ 277,000 ₫ cho gói 1 tháng (chỉ 9,233₫/ngày)
1,239,000₫ 597,000 ₫ cho gói 3 tháng (chỉ 6,633₫/ngày)
2,469,000₫ 1,027,000 ₫ cho gói 6 tháng (chỉ 5,706₫/ngày)
4,929,000₫ 1,417,000 ₫ cho gói 12 tháng (chỉ 3,936₫/ngày)


Sau khi chuyển khoản, vui lòng đợi trình duyệt tự động điều hướng bạn trở lại Engnovate và bạn sẽ ngay lập tức nhận được mã kích hoạt tài khoản premium.
Nếu có lỗi xảy ra, bạn có thể liên hệ với team thông qua một trong các phương thức: email đến helloengnovate@gmail.com hoặc nhắn tin qua facebook.com/engnovate.
Vì toàn bộ công cụ trên website đều có thể sử dụng thử miễn phí, Engnovate không hỗ trợ hoàn tiền.