🔥 Today Only: Save 30% on Premium — Offer Ends Soon! - Upgrade Now!
Multiple Graphs

Band 7+: The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009, the second compares the percentage of trains running in time and target in the period.

Image for topic: The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009, the second compares the percentage of trains running in time and target in the period.
Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.
The image contains two line graphs, the first titled "Number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009," shows a range of 30-50 million passengers with a slight increase in 2003 and a decrease in 2008. The second graph titled "Percentage of trains running on time compared with the target," shows a range of 90-100% with a notable dip in 2006 and a target line set at 95%.
Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.
Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The first line graph illustrates how many passengers traveled by train between 2000 to 2009, while the second one shows the proportion of trains that are punctual compared with the target.

Overall, the number of train travelers increased gradually over the years with the figure of 2005 being the highest. Furthermore, the rate of punctual trains increased throughout the period.

Looking first at the train passengers, it stood at around 39 million people in 2000. Thereafter, the number of rail passengers fluctuated until it reached a peak at almost 50 million in 2005, although the figure then dropped back down to 40 million in 2008, before rising to around 42 million at the end of the period.

Moving on the punctual trains, the rates of trains which ran on time in the year 2000 was 92%, compared to the expected targets of 95%. The proportion of trains increased to 96% in 2004, after which this figure witnessed a considerable decline to 92% in 2006. Finally, these punctual trains quickly increased up to 97% by 2008, and then maintained the level in 2009.

Word Count: 182

Answers On The Same Topic:

The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009, the second compares the percentage of trains running in time and target in the period.

The former line graph shows the number of train passengers between 2000 and 2009, and the latter line graph illustrates the percentage of trains running on time. Overall, while the number of passengers showed a minor increase throughout the period, the percentage of trains running on time fluctuated considerably. It is also evident that by […]

The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009, the second compares the percentage of trains running in time and target in the period.

the given former line graph illustrates how many people used to train between 2000 to 2009. The letter graph shows the information about-the percentage of trains are coming on time compared to torget-. Overall, the two figures experienced some fluctuates, with the figures showing a general upward trend. The figure for passengers showed mainly fluctuates, […]

The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009, the second compares the percentage of trains running in time and target in the period.

The given line graphs illustrate data on the number of train passengers and also the proportion of trains running on time between 2000 and 2009. Overall, it is clear that the number of passengers grew slightly, even though there were some fluctuations. Meanwhile, the percentage of trains running on time changed throughout the period. Focusing […]

The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009, the second compares the percentage of trains running in time and target in the period.

Two given graphs elucidate the data of the amount of train users from 2000 to 2009 and the proportion of on-time trains collated to the standard target in the same period. On the whole, the number of passengers witnessed an overall growth at the end of the period. The similar trend was observed in the […]

The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009, the second compares the percentage of trains running in time and target in the period.

The first line graph illustrates how many people travelled by train between 2000 and 2009, and the second graph provides information regarding the proportion of trains running on time. Overall, the number of passengers witnessed a noticeable increase, despite some fluctuations. Moreover, on-time trains recorded the highest figure in the final year, although they were […]

See All

Other Topics:

The table and bar chart compares the household chores and leisure time activities spend by men and women

The table and bar chart illustrates the average minutes of spending for leisure activities and household activities by two genders. Overall, it is clear that men spend their most of time on leisure time activities while women devote their most of time on household activities. To begin with, leisure activities such as TV, video, radio […]

The pie charts illustrate the proportion of graduates with different levels of qualifications in science and art working in a specific engineering company between 1980 and 2008.

The two pie charts demonstrate the percentage of degree holders along with six different levels of credentials in science and art performing a job in a particular engineering company between 1980 and 2008. Overall, graduates in master-science remained the highest proportion in engineering company, while Ph.D science overtook in figure with the passage of time. […]

the charts illlustrates the UK's steel industry from 1970 to 2000.

The two line graphs illustrate changes in the steel industry in the UK, along with the number of steel industry employees in a 30-year period, from 1970 to 2000. Overall, total demand and UK production decreased steadily, as did the number of staff; however, the import experienced an growth. In 1970,it is obvious that the […]

Task 1: The bar chart below shows the number of tourists who traveled to Australia in 1995 and 2005. The line graph shows the number of tourists who did this type of holiday. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar graph compares how many tourists who visited from the US, The UK and Japan to Australia from 1995 to 2005, however, the line graph depicts the number of visitor who traveled two types of holiday their destination between 1995 and 2005. Overall, the number of UK and US visitors who traveled increase over […]

The chart and table below show the results of a survey of library users at a university. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The provided pie chart illustrates data about outcome of a survey of people categories who visit university’s library, and the table gives information about visitors’s satisfaction. Overall, it is clearly seen that the majority of library users are full-time undergraduate students, while the minority consists of academic staff. In addition, the percentage of satisfaction is […]

The pie charts illustrate the proportion of graduates with different levels of qualifications in science and art working in a specific engineering company between 1980 and 2008.

The two pie charts provides information about the percentage of graduates with various educational levels in two different fields in engineering company in the years 1980 and 2008. Is it clear that gualification levels of employeers improved over time. Ph.D-Science and Master art constituted the largest proportion, while Ph.D- Art and first degree- art made […]

See All
We have detected unusual activity on your device.
Please verify your identity to continue.
Note: This verification step won't sign you in. If you have a premium account, please log in to access the service as usual.
Google/Gmail Verification
Or verify using Email/Code
We've sent a verification code to:
youremail@gmail.com (Not your email?)
Enter it below to complete the verification process.
Ensure your email address is correct, your inbox is not full, and you check your spam folder. If no email arrives, consider using an alternative email.
You will need a Premium plan to perform your action!
Note: If you already have a premium account, please log in to access our services as usual.

Plans & Pricing

Our mission is to make quality education accessible for everyone.
However, to keep our hardworking team running and this service alive, we genuinely need your support!
By opting for a premium plan, not only do you sustain us in achieving the mission, but you also unlock advanced features to enrich your learning experience.

Free

For learners who aren't pressed for time

What's included on Free
100+ Cambridge IELTS Tests
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation (2 times/month)
Instant IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation (5 times/month)
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator (2 times/month)
500+ Dictation & Shadowing Exercises
100+ Pronunciation Exercises
Flashcards
Other Advanced Tools

Premium

For those serious about advancing their English proficiency, and for IELTS candidates aspiring to boost their band score by 1-2 points (especially in writing & speaking) in just 30 days or less

What's included on Premium
Save Your IELTS Test Progress
Unlock All Courses & IELTS Tests
Unlimited AI Conversations
Unlimited AI Writing Enhancement Exercises
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation
Checked Answers Will Not Be Published
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Sample Generator
Unlimited Usage Of Advanced Tools
Priority Support within 24h (12-month plan only)

Due to the nature of our service and the provided free trials, payments are non-refundable.
Nếu bạn là người Việt Nam và không có hoặc không muốn trả bằng credit/debit cards, bạn có thể thanh toán bằng phương thức chuyển khoản:



Chọn gói:
419,000₫ 277,000 ₫ cho gói 1 tháng (chỉ 9,233₫/ngày)
1,239,000₫ 597,000 ₫ cho gói 3 tháng (chỉ 6,633₫/ngày)
2,469,000₫ 1,027,000 ₫ cho gói 6 tháng (chỉ 5,706₫/ngày)
4,929,000₫ 1,417,000 ₫ cho gói 12 tháng (chỉ 3,936₫/ngày)


Sau khi chuyển khoản, vui lòng đợi trình duyệt tự động điều hướng bạn trở lại Engnovate và bạn sẽ ngay lập tức nhận được mã kích hoạt tài khoản premium.
Nếu có lỗi xảy ra, bạn có thể liên hệ với team thông qua một trong các phương thức: email đến helloengnovate@gmail.com hoặc nhắn tin qua facebook.com/engnovate.
Vì toàn bộ công cụ trên website đều có thể sử dụng thử miễn phí, Engnovate không hỗ trợ hoàn tiền.