🔥 Today Only: Save 30% on Premium — Offer Ends Soon! - Upgrade Now!
Bar Chart

Band 5+: The graph below shows the information on waste disposal in a European country from 2005 to 2008. Summarise the information making comparisons where relevant.

Image for topic: The graph below shows the information on waste disposal in a European country from 2005 to 2008. Summarise the information making comparisons where relevant.
Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.
The image displays a bar graph illustrating amounts related to three methods of disposal—landfill, burning, dumping in sea—over three years: 2005, 2006, 2008. For 2005: landfill approximately 1950, burning around 1600, and dumping in sea roughly 1100; for 2006: landfill near 1750, burning around 1400, and dumping in sea about 1200; for 2008: landfill approximately 1300, burning around 1200, and dumping in sea roughly 900.
Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.
Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The given graph illustrates three different waste disposal method used in a country of Europe from 2005 to 2008. Clearly, the method of dumping has changed from filling the land to filling the seawater.

Throwing into the land was the main disposal method in 2005, about 2000 million tones were disposed in this method. But this method seems like did not worked out greatly. It decreased dramatically and in 2006, 400 million tones less waste was disposed by landfilling. The trend followed in 2008 with the same amount of decrease.

Burning was used more in 2006 than the two other given years. Almost 900 million tones of waste was burnt in 2005 and 2008. In 2006, the amount was 300 million tones more than them.

In 2005, the method of disposing waste into the sea water was less popular, with 1200 million tones waste disposed in this way. But, the amount has increased gradually and was a bit more than 1400 million tones. The trend continues, with approximately 1630 million tones of waste thrown in the sea in 2008.

Among the three method, burning was the less popular method and land filling was most popular though dumping in the sea was replacing it in a large number.

Word Count: 207

Answers On The Same Topic:

The graph below shows the information on waste disposal in a European country from 2005 to 2008. Summarise the information making comparisons where relevant.

The graph below given data on waste disposal in a European country over the period from 2005 to 2008. Generally, it is clear that landfill showed the higher reises. However, burning showed the most lowest proportion. In 2005, Landfill was most common method to waste disposal. Also the graph showed high proportion amount in 2000 […]

The graph below shows the information on waste disposal in a European country from 2005 to 2008. Summarise the information making comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart illustrates the volume of waste disposed of by a European country between 2005 and 2008. Overall, landfill was the most common method of waste disposal in 2005 and 2006, while dumping waste in the sea became the leading method in 2008. First and foremost, landfill in 2005 had the highest result across […]

The graph below shows the information on waste disposal in a European country from 2005 to 2008. Summarise the information making comparisons where relevant.

The graph illustrates show the disposal of waste in a European country between 2005 and 2008. For landfill, the amount of disposal waste maximum in 2005 and it was 2000 million tones, followed by 2008 and amount was 1750 million tonesand lowest in 2006 and it was 1600 million tones. For buring, maximum amounts of […]

The graph below shows the information on waste disposal in a European country from 2005 to 2008. Summarise the information making comparisons where relevant.

In this report i am going to describe the graph that illustrates the ratio of waste disposal in european country from 2005 to 2008. In 2005 the highest waste disposal is conducted by landfill that is 2000 million tonnes. burning waste is 900 million in 2005 and the waste that is dumping in the sea […]

The graph below shows the information on waste disposal in a European country from 2005 to 2008. Summarise the information making comparisons where relevant.

The given graph illustrates the amount of waste disposal by using three methods in a European country from 2005 to 2008. It is clear that using method of landfilling was the highest at the beginning of the period but dumping in the sea took the lead last year. In 2005, about 2000 million tons of […]

See All

Other Topics:

The chart below gives information on the numbers of workers in different occupations who migrated to Australia between 2009 and 2012

The chart illustrates that the number of workers in different occupations who migrated to Australia between 2009 and 2012 Overall, it is clearly seen that, the chart shows the highest percentage of Accountant 28 thousand workers in 2010. while the lowest percentage of computer programmer 2 thousand workers in 2009. In Australia. According to the […]

The bar chart below compares the main modes of transport used by people to travel to work in London in 2000 and 2020

The graphic compares the total proportions of using of 4 different main modes of transport which were Car, Public Transport, Bicycle and Walking used by people to arrive at their workplace in London from 2000 to 2020. Overall, Car’s figure dominated the ranking table through years despite a small drop. Both Public Transport and Bicycle […]

The bar graph represents the number of luxury cars sold in 2015 and 2016 in a country.

The bar chart given compares the number of luxury cars sold in 2015 and 2016 in a country. Overall, BMW 3 series and Mercedes-Benz C-class accounted for the largest share, while BMW 5 series and Infinite accounted for the lowest figure. Moreover, the number of the majority luxury cars sold registered a decrease during the […]

The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in four countries in 1950 and 2002, and projections for 2050.

The bar chart compares the proportions of the world’s population living in India, China, the USA and Japan in 1950 and 2002, with projections for 2050. Overall, China had the largest share of the world population in 1950 and 2002, although its percentage is expected to decline considerably by 2050. In contrast, India’s proportion is […]

the chart below compares levels of recycling, as well as some less environmentally friendly forms of waste management, in fifteen European countries

The chart gives information about various waste management methods in fifteen European countries. Overall, most of these countries use landfill as a common method to manage waste. Greece has the highest percentage of landfill waste management while denmark is the highest level of waste incineration. Austria leads in controlling waste through recycled/composed. Germany has the […]

The bar chart below shows the typical percentage of the workforce present in a corporate office, by day of the week, in two specific years: 2020 and 2023. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Aim for around 150 words.

The graph provides information about the proportion of workforce attendance in a corporate office by day of the week in 2020 and 2023. Overall, while mid-week presence remained the highest in both years, Friday’s attendance consistently fell below the broader average. In addition, a remarkable decline in overall office attendance was recorded in 2023. In […]

See All
We have detected unusual activity on your device.
Please verify your identity to continue.
Note: This verification step won't sign you in. If you have a premium account, please log in to access the service as usual.
Google/Gmail Verification
Or verify using Email/Code
We've sent a verification code to:
youremail@gmail.com (Not your email?)
Enter it below to complete the verification process.
Ensure your email address is correct, your inbox is not full, and you check your spam folder. If no email arrives, consider using an alternative email.
You will need a Premium plan to perform your action!
Note: If you already have a premium account, please log in to access our services as usual.

Plans & Pricing

Our mission is to make quality education accessible for everyone.
However, to keep our hardworking team running and this service alive, we genuinely need your support!
By opting for a premium plan, not only do you sustain us in achieving the mission, but you also unlock advanced features to enrich your learning experience.

Free

For learners who aren't pressed for time

What's included on Free
100+ Cambridge IELTS Tests
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation (2 times/month)
Instant IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation (5 times/month)
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator (2 times/month)
500+ Dictation & Shadowing Exercises
100+ Pronunciation Exercises
Flashcards
Other Advanced Tools

Premium

For those serious about advancing their English proficiency, and for IELTS candidates aspiring to boost their band score by 1-2 points (especially in writing & speaking) in just 30 days or less

What's included on Premium
Save Your IELTS Test Progress
Unlock All Courses & IELTS Tests
Unlimited AI Conversations
Unlimited AI Writing Enhancement Exercises
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation
Checked Answers Will Not Be Published
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Sample Generator
Unlimited Usage Of Advanced Tools
Priority Support within 24h (12-month plan only)

Due to the nature of our service and the provided free trials, payments are non-refundable.
Nếu bạn là người Việt Nam và không có hoặc không muốn trả bằng credit/debit cards, bạn có thể thanh toán bằng phương thức chuyển khoản:



Chọn gói:
419,000₫ 277,000 ₫ cho gói 1 tháng (chỉ 9,233₫/ngày)
1,239,000₫ 597,000 ₫ cho gói 3 tháng (chỉ 6,633₫/ngày)
2,469,000₫ 1,027,000 ₫ cho gói 6 tháng (chỉ 5,706₫/ngày)
4,929,000₫ 1,417,000 ₫ cho gói 12 tháng (chỉ 3,936₫/ngày)


Sau khi chuyển khoản, vui lòng đợi trình duyệt tự động điều hướng bạn trở lại Engnovate và bạn sẽ ngay lập tức nhận được mã kích hoạt tài khoản premium.
Nếu có lỗi xảy ra, bạn có thể liên hệ với team thông qua một trong các phương thức: email đến helloengnovate@gmail.com hoặc nhắn tin qua facebook.com/engnovate.
Vì toàn bộ công cụ trên website đều có thể sử dụng thử miễn phí, Engnovate không hỗ trợ hoàn tiền.