Band 4+: The maps below provide information about an island in 1995 and 2005

The report adequately covers the main changes between the two maps, providing a general overview and highlighting key developments. However, there's room for improvement in terms of detail and accuracy. For instance, mentioning the specific locations of features (north, south, etc.) and quantifying changes (e.g., the number of houses) would enhance the description. Also, ensure accurate reporting of details; for example, the report mentions three walking paths in 1995, which is not depicted in the visual description. To improve, focus on providing more specific details and ensuring accuracy in describing the changes between the two time periods. The report falls short of the required 150 words.

The report demonstrates some organization, but the progression of ideas is not always clear. The overview is present but could be more specific. Transitions between sentences and paragraphs need improvement to enhance the flow of information. For example, the connection between the initial state of the island and its subsequent development could be more explicitly stated. Paragraphing is acceptable but could be refined to better group related information.

The vocabulary used is somewhat limited and occasionally inaccurate ('facilites,' 'residents were developed,' 'invented'). There is a need for a wider range of vocabulary to describe the changes more precisely and effectively. Consider using synonyms and more descriptive language to avoid repetition and enhance the clarity of the report. For instance, instead of repeatedly using 'developed,' explore alternatives like 'constructed,' 'established,' or 'expanded.' Boost vocabulary complexity to elevate the overall score.

The report contains several grammatical errors that affect clarity. Errors include incorrect verb tenses ('it were multiplied'), subject-verb agreement issues ('path trough'), and awkward phrasing ('more road were built'). Sentence structure is often simple and lacks complexity. To improve, focus on using a wider range of grammatical structures and ensuring accuracy in verb tense, subject-verb agreement, and sentence construction. Proofreading carefully for errors is essential.