🔥 Today Only: Save 30% on Premium — Offer Ends Soon! - Upgrade Now!
Table

Band 6+: The table below shows changes in the numbers of residents cycling to work in different areas of the UK between 2001 and 2011.

Image for topic: The table below shows changes in the numbers of residents cycling to work in different areas of the UK between 2001 and 2011.
Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.
The image shows data for residents cycling to work in UK areas between 2001 and 2011: Inner London 43,494 (2001), 106,219 (2011), +144%; Brighton and Hove 3,168 (2001), 6,635 (2011), +109%; Bristol, City of 8,108 (2001), 15,768 (2011), +94%; Manchester 4,615 (2001), 8,926 (2011), +93%; Newcastle upon Tyne 1,781 (2001), 3,223 (2011), +81%; Sheffield 2,365 (2001), 4,267 (2011), +80%; Cardiff 3,514 (2001), 5,791 (2011), +65%; Gateshead 816 (2001), 1,344 (2011), +65%; Exeter 2,304 (2001), 3,542 (2011), +54%; Leeds 4,189 (2001), 6,237 (2011), +49%; Liverpool 2,686 (2001), 3,970 (2011), +48%; Outer London 33,836 (2001), 49,070 (2011), +45%.
Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.
Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The provided chart illustrates differences in the figures of citizens cycling to work place in various territories of the United Kingdom since 2001 and 2011.

Overall,is it notably projected that in some observed areas rates were initially low, while other shares were incredibly higher. Additionally, it is obvious that after a decade all of the numbers have increased significantly.

To begin with the description and comparison of the first 6 areas, Inner London had the biggest unsimilarity of 144% starting from 43.494 and finishing with 106.218, respectively. Regarding Brighton and Hove, the final figure was 6.635 and their proportion accounted for 109%. The observation of Manchester, however, commenced with the mark of around 4.600 people with the percentage of 83. Meanwhile, the diagram represents an increase of 94% for Bristol. A rise was also seen in Newcastle upon Tyne with the statistics of 81% and 3.223 citizens. Lastly, Sheffield’s outcomes indicated 80% after a rise of levels to 4.267 people.

Turning to the previously undesribed data, it is effortless to notice that Cardiff around 3.500 employees commuted to work by bicycles before an ascent of 65 percent. According to the evidence, the boost in cyclists of Gatehead was estumated at 61 percent, while for Exeter only 54 percent, respectively. Leeds, by the way, showed results of 49% and 6.237 workers commuting to work via that mode of transportation. Moreover, throughout Liverpool, approximately 1.300 new members of personnel with the same preferences of transportation estimated the proportion of 48%. Finally, within Outer London, around 6 thousand members of staff commutted to work via bicycles.

Word Count: 263

Answers On The Same Topic:

The table below shows changes in the numbers of residents cycling to work in different areas of the UK between 2001 and 2011.

the table compares information about how many habitants cycled to work everyday between 2001 and 2011 in United Kingdom. It is clear that, the table provides information about the number of people who travelled to work by bicycle in terms their of area, number, and percentage change within the 10 years in the UK. Inner […]

The table below shows changes in the numbers of residents cycling to work in different areas of the UK between 2001 and 2011.

The depicted, given illustrated table delineates the information about the numbers of residents cycling to work in different areas of the UK between 2001 and 2011 where we dicuss the difference and will see the changes in percentage. The overall scenario of the given table quiet vividly exhibits where the years show how cycling work […]

The table below shows changes in the numbers of residents cycling to work in different areas of the UK between 2001 and 2011.

The table represents data regarding the number of residents going to work by bicycle across different regions in the UK from 2001 to 2011. Overall, Inner London is shown to have the most growth compared to other regions in the UK, while Outer London is shown to have the least percentage increase over the decade […]

The table below shows changes in the numbers of residents cycling to work in different areas of the UK between 2001 and 2011.

The provided table compares the amount of people who used bicycles to travel to work in various areas of the United Kingdom in 2001 and 2011. Looking from an overall perspective, it is apparent that the number of british people cycling to work experienced general increase. In addition, the change in the proportion of cyclists […]

See All

Other Topics:

The table shows the percentage of household with electronic goods in New Zealand in 1997 and 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The given table illustrates information about the proportion of household with electronic items in New Zealand, presenting data for six different categories across 1997 and 2002 Overall, it is evident that television was increased in almost every house in New Zealand, whereas Washing Machine showed no change during the period. Looking at the details, Personal […]

The table shows the export values of various products in 2009 and 2010.

The given table indicates the export values of five product categories between 1997 and 2010. Overall, it is obvious that the export values experienced an upward trend in most categories, while the figures for clothing and manufacturing exhibited a reverse pattern. In addition, equipment and telecommunication constituted the highest revenues throughout the surveyed period. Equipment […]

The table shows the export values of various products in 2009 and 2010.

The given table indicates the export values of five products categories between 1997 and 2010 Overall, It is obvious that the export values experienced an upward trend in most categories while the figures for clothing and manufacturing exhibited a reverse pattern. In addition, equipment and telecommunication consititued the highest revenues throughout the surveyed period. Equipment […]

The charts below show response to a questionnaire given by two groups of people (Club members and the general public) who showed their opinions about a new theatre

The tables illustrate data based on survey responses of participants in the club and the audience to a newly constructed theatre. The questionnaire compares opinions on production quality, information about the plays/performances to the public, and facilities in the theatre. It is clear that the vast majority of people surveyed are completely satisfied with the […]

The table below gives information about mangement posiotions held by women in a European country in 2006. summarise the information by selecting ard reporting the main features. and make comparsions where relevant.

The table compares the percentages of women occupying three levels of management across four different industries in a European nation in 2006. Overall, the hospitality industry recorded the highest proportions of women at all three management levels, whereas manufacturing consistently had the lowest figures. Across the four industries, managers accounted for higher percentages than executive […]

The table below gives information about rail transport in four countries in 2007.

The table provides information about the usage of rail transportation if four distinct countries in 2007. Overall, while China was the dominant country in passenger travel, Canada presented the opposite, leading in cargo volume. In contrast, Malaysia and the UAE displayed virtually identical figures across all categories. Regarding passenger travel, China dominated the category with […]

See All
We have detected unusual activity on your device.
Please verify your identity to continue.
Note: This verification step won't sign you in. If you have a premium account, please log in to access the service as usual.
Google/Gmail Verification
Or verify using Email/Code
We've sent a verification code to:
youremail@gmail.com (Not your email?)
Enter it below to complete the verification process.
Ensure your email address is correct, your inbox is not full, and you check your spam folder. If no email arrives, consider using an alternative email.
You will need a Premium plan to perform your action!
Note: If you already have a premium account, please log in to access our services as usual.

Plans & Pricing

Our mission is to make quality education accessible for everyone.
However, to keep our hardworking team running and this service alive, we genuinely need your support!
By opting for a premium plan, not only do you sustain us in achieving the mission, but you also unlock advanced features to enrich your learning experience.

Free

For learners who aren't pressed for time

What's included on Free
100+ Cambridge IELTS Tests
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation (2 times/month)
Instant IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation (2 times/month)
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator (2 times/month)
500+ Dictation & Shadowing Exercises
100+ Pronunciation Exercises
Flashcards
Other Advanced Tools

Premium

For those serious about advancing their English proficiency, and for IELTS candidates aspiring to boost their band score by 1-2 points (especially in writing & speaking) in just 30 days or less

What's included on Premium
Save Your IELTS Test Progress & Analyze Mistakes By Question Type
Save Your Own Flashcard Sets & Use Them On Any Device
Unlock All Courses, IELTS Tests, Section & Part Practice
Unlimited AI Conversations
Unlimited AI Writing Enhancement Exercises
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation
Checked Answers Will Not Be Published
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Sample Generator
Unlimited Usage Of Advanced Tools & AI Features
Priority Support within 24h (12-month plan only)

Due to the nature of our service and the provided free trials, payments are non-refundable.