The given chart illustrates the proportion of good ratings provided by students for different academic fields of a Chinese university in 2000, 2005 and 2010.
In general, it could be inferred that Print Resources criterion had the largest proportion of good ratings while Range of modules offered occupied the smallest one. In addition, as for field of Building/ teaching Facilities, the good ratings was unchanged through three-year periods.
Initially, in 2000, Print Resources had the biggest proportion of good ratings, reaching its peak of 87%. This was followed by the percentage of Building/ teaching Facilities and Technical Quality, reaching 75% and 63%, respectively. Moreover, as for aspect of Electronic Resources, the proportion reached nearly a half percent while Range of modules offered occupied the smallest proportion, reaching at 33%.
However, in 2005, the percentage of Print resources had a slight increase, reaching 95%. While in the field of Technical Quality and Building/ teaching Facilities, the proportion were unchanged through five-year periods, there was nearly a double rising in Electronic Resources. Furthermore, Range of modules offered had decreased slightly, reaching 30%.
Moreover, in 2010, the proportion of Print Resources had seen a slight decrease which dropped at 91% while Technical Quality and Electronic Resources were increased roughly, staying at 69% and 89%, respectively. The amount of Building/ teaching Facilities was unchanged after next five-year periods and Range of modules offered had declined moderately to its lowest point, reaching only 26%.