24 Hours Only: Get 39% OFF on Our Premium Plan - Check Out Now!
Table

Band 9: The table shows the results of a survey in 2004 which asked undergraduate and f postgraduate students of a UK university whether they were satisfied with the facilities at the university.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Image for topic: The table shows the results of a survey in 2004 which asked undergraduate and f postgraduate students of a UK university whether they were satisfied with the facilities at the university.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.
The image shows that, for study facilities in bedrooms, 65% of postgraduate students were very satisfied, 20% quite satisfied, and 15% not at all satisfied, while 67% of undergraduate students were very satisfied, 17% quite satisfied, and 26% not at all satisfied; for the university cafeteria, 52% of postgraduate students were very satisfied, 32% quite satisfied, and 16% not at all satisfied, compared to 50% of undergraduate students being very satisfied, 27% quite satisfied, and 23% not at all satisfied; for social facilities, 80% of postgraduate students were very satisfied, 15% quite satisfied, and 5% not at all satisfied, with undergraduate students showing 45% very satisfied, 25% quite satisfied, and 30% not at all satisfied.
Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.
Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The table illustrates the level of satisfaction of undergraduate and postgraduate students with three different facilities, namely study facilities in the bedroom, university cafeteria, and social facilities at a UK university, based on a survey conducted in 2004.

Overall, undergraduate students were more satisfied with most facilities at the university, while the percentage of these students who were quite satisfied was lower than that of postgraduate students. An opposite trend can be seen in social facilities, where postgraduate students showed higher levels of satisfaction with these types of amenities.

Regarding study facilities in the bedroom, 67% of undergraduate students felt very satisfied, while that of postgraduate students stood at 65%. However, the level of dissatisfaction was considerably higher in undergraduate students, with 26%, whereas postgraduate students accounted for only 15%. The figures for undergraduate and postgraduate students who were quite satisfied were 17% and 20%, respectively.

There was a similar trend in the university cafeteria, with the percentage of undergraduate students who were very satisfied being higher, while a smaller proportion were quite satisfied. However, this group of students showed remarkably lower levels of dissatisfaction, accounting for only 3%.

In contrast, the proportion of very satisfied postgraduate students with social facilities was 80%, which was nearly double that of undergraduate students, while the figure for dissatisfied undergraduate students was 30%, which was six times as high as that of postgraduate students.

Word Count: 231

Answers On The Same Topic:

The table shows the results of a survey in 2004 which asked undergraduate and f postgraduate students of a UK university whether they were satisfied with the facilities at the university.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The table illustrates the results of a survey conducted in 2004 among undergraduate and postgraduate students at a UK university, focusing on their level of satisfaction with university facilities. Overall, postgraduate students were generally more satisfied than undergraduates, particularly with social facilities. In contrast, undergraduate students expressed the highest level of satisfaction with the university […]

The table shows the results of a survey in 2004 which asked undergraduate and f postgraduate students of a UK university whether they were satisfied with the facilities at the university.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The table illustrate the outcome of survey held on 2004 of undergraduate and postgraduate students of a UK university about there satisfaction regarding the facilities provided by university. Overall , there where three areas which measure the satisfaction level of students . They were study facilities in bedroom, univeristy cafeteria and social facilities however the […]

The table shows the results of a survey in 2004 which asked undergraduate and f postgraduate students of a UK university whether they were satisfied with the facilities at the university.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The table illustrates the percentage of both undergraduate and postgraduate students’ satisfaction about the university’s amenities through a survey handled at a UK university in 2004. Overall, postgraduate students expressed the greatest satisfaction with social facilities while undergraduate students were content with the university cafeteria. In general, most students were satisfied with university facilities. In […]

The table shows the results of a survey in 2004 which asked undergraduate and f postgraduate students of a UK university whether they were satisfied with the facilities at the university.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The given table delineates how undergraduate and postgraduate students satisfied with different facilities at the univeristy in 2004. Overall, it is readily apparent that most students highly contended with the facilities because the proportion for all categories above 50%, except for the social facilities due to the viewpoint of undergraduate students. Notably, the most radically […]

See All

Other Topics:

The following table shows the number of people from five European nations living in each other's countries in 2011. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The data presenting an information about the amount of people from five European nation that living in each other’s countries in two thousand eleven. over all, there is 3,298.000 people from Britain, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain that live in each other’s country. The british that count in the data, mostly live in spain. There […]

The line graph below shows the number of visitors (in millions) to three different museums in a European city between 2000 and 2020. 📈 Data (Figure) Year Museum A Museum B Museum C 2000 2.0 3.5 1.0 2005 2.5 3.0 1.5 2010 3.5 2.5 2.0 2015 4.0 2.0 3.5 2020 4.5 1.5 5.0

The line graph below depicts the number of visitors to three distinct museums measured in millons in a European city from 2000 to 2020. Overall, it is clear that the figure for Museum C witnessed a significant increase with a steady growth. By contrast, Museum B followed a complete opposite pattern, experiencing a downward trend. […]

.The table shows the number of international visitors arrivals came to nine different countries and the percentage changes between 2009 and 2010.

The table compares the number of international tourists arriving in 9 countries in 2009 and 2010. Overall, while US, Spain, UK, and Italy maintained as the countries with the least noticeable changes over the period, Turkey, China and Germany exhibited the most pronounced growth. In contrast, France’s figures remained unchanged and Hong Kong showed little […]

The graph below shows the average monthly rainfall in three different cities (London, Tokyo, and Madrid) over the course of a single year. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The provided graph elucidates the average monthly rainfall in millimetres in London, Tokyo, and Madrid over the course of four seasons. It is noteworthy that Tokyo experienced the most severe precipitation fluctuation over the year. According to the given data, London saw the most stable rainfall rate, fluctuating from 40 millimetres in July to 65 […]

the table gives information about five types of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010, 2012, 2014. Sumarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The table illustrates numerous types of transport registered in Australia and the changes between 2010, 2012, and 2014. Overall, it is clear that, passenger transports was common in every year, and commercial vehicles remained stable throughout the periods.Light trucks was the least for using, but percentage change was one of the highest. Firstly, in the […]

the table gives information about five types of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010, 2012, 2014. Sumarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The table illustrates numerous species of transports registered in Australia and many changes between 2010,2012 and 2014. Overall,it is clear that, leader was passenger transports in every year,as well as,commercial vehicles was stabled throughout the periods.The lowest rang was light trucks,but percentage change was on of the higher. Firstly,in the past,for comfort people tend to […]

See All
We have detected unusual activity on your device.
Please verify your identity to continue.
Note: This verification step won't sign you in. If you have a premium account, please log in to access the service as usual.
Google/Gmail Verification
Or verify using Email/Code
We've sent a verification code to:
youremail@gmail.com (Not your email?)
Enter it below to complete the verification process.
Ensure your email address is correct, your inbox is not full, and you check your spam folder. If no email arrives, consider using an alternative email.
You will need a Premium plan to perform your action!
Note: If you already have a premium account, please log in to access our services as usual.

Plans & Pricing

Our mission is to make quality education accessible and free for everyone.
However, to keep our hardworking team running and this service alive, we genuinely need your support!
By opting for a premium plan, not only do you sustain us in achieving the mission, but you also unlock advanced features to enrich your learning experience.

Free

For learners who aren't pressed for time

What's included on Free
1000+ IELTS Tests & Samples
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation (2 times/month)
Instant IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation (5 times/month)
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator (2 times/month)
500+ Dictation & Shadowing Exercises
100+ Pronunciation Exercises
Flashcards
Other Advanced Tools

Premium

For those serious about advancing their English proficiency, and for IELTS candidates aspiring to boost their band score by 1-2 points (especially in writing & speaking) in just 30 days or less

What's included on Premium
Save Your IELTS Test Progress
Unlock All Courses & Content
Unlimited AI Conversations
Unlimited AI Writing Enhancement Exercises
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation
Checked Answers Will Not Be Published
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Sample Generator
Unlimited Usage Of Advanced Tools

Due to the nature of our service and the provided free trials, payments are non-refundable.
Nếu bạn là người Việt Nam và không có hoặc không muốn trả bằng credit/debit cards, bạn có thể thanh toán bằng phương thức chuyển khoản:



Chọn gói:
279,000₫ 157,000 ₫ cho gói 1 tháng (chỉ 5,233₫/ngày)
819,000₫ 397,000 ₫ cho gói 3 tháng (chỉ 4,411₫/ngày)
1,649,000₫ 667,000 ₫ cho gói 6 tháng (chỉ 3,706₫/ngày)
3,299,000₫ 857,000 ₫ cho gói 12 tháng (chỉ 2,381₫/ngày)


Sau khi chuyển khoản, vui lòng đợi trình duyệt tự động điều hướng bạn trở lại Engnovate và bạn sẽ ngay lập tức nhận được mã kích hoạt tài khoản premium.
Nếu có lỗi xảy ra, bạn có thể liên hệ với team thông qua một trong các phương thức: email đến helloengnovate@gmail.com hoặc nhắn tin qua facebook.com/engnovate.
Vì toàn bộ công cụ trên website đều có thể sử dụng thử miễn phí, Engnovate không hỗ trợ hoàn tiền.