Some people think that science and technology is a reason of environmental problems and only they themselves can be a solution of caused pollution problems while others say that only solution is reject technology and science from our life. I belive that both views can solve ecological problems, but each have their advantages adn disadvantages.
It’s no secret to anyone that science and technologies have caused a lot of ecological problems and slowly destroing our world. As proof, most of the thing that surround us have made in factories or in laboratories which causes harm to environment. For example, the factories and cars pollute the air with smoke, which will cause a global warming, or materials which collecting for new inventions, technologies gradually kill our world. As such, logical solution of these problems would be to reject technology and science and return to simple way of life.
On the other hand, no one is ready and want to refuse comfortable life without technology. Because, it took a lot of time to reach this level of life and its foolishly just to reject it. As fact, technology and science was developed very hard and fast in the last 100 years by compare with other centuries. In that way, if science and technology will develop in the same speed, people will solve the pollution problems in the recent decades. In addition, scientists a long ago started to slowly solve the environmental problems by giving ideas, creating new inventions, and experiments.
In conclusion, i agree that this 2 ideas of solution environmental problems would work, but think that solving using science and technology would be better solution.