The question on whether very exertional sports such as skydiving and rock climbing should be banned is gaining traction. These events are deemed extremely dangerous with risks of causing physical disabilities and mortality. Therefore, a fair number of people are contending that they should be abolished. While it remains a fact that they pose substantial threats, I disagree that they should be banned since these risks can be mitigated with government involvement and a more standard sporting organization.
To begin with, extreme sports are the only ways some individuals feel fulfilled and self-actualized. As humans, we all have different activities and experiences that foster personal fulfillment. Some people find fulfillment in a job, while others derive satisfaction in the ownership of businesses. Others still, can find relish moments only in sports, particularly in the more exerting ones. Therefore, putting a ban on these exerting activities suffices to deny some members of society the opportunity to live a fulfilled life. Additionally, these sports drive the will for success thereby stimulating strong personality development. Through involvement in these activities, participants develop strong character such as determination, mettle, self-belief, diligence and hard work. Again, these games are a means of entertainment which if harnessed can generate a sizable revenue for economic development.
Admittedly, it can be argued that extreme sports are potentially fatal but this reason is not sufficient to call for its complete prohibition. Moreover, there are steps the government or sporting community can take to downsize the associated menace to life and physical well-being. Both governments and sports organizers can construct hazard-free sports centres. For instance, soft pad landings can be provided for skydiving and protective coverings can be laid on sharp rock edges in rock climbing arenas.
To conclude, extreme sports have the potential for engendering physical harm and even death. However, this sole reason should not be a reason for their abolishment as there are ways the government and sports planning committees can sabotage these risks.