There is a growing suggestion that people should aim to acquire a well-paid profession instead of becoming freelancers. In my opinion, although working for a company provides greater financial security, being self-employed offers more advantages.
Many proponents of being a salaried worker argue that it ensures financial stability. If an individual works for an organization, they are less likely to worry about their income being affected by the company’s revenue, as most employees’ wages are fixed and guaranteed to be paid in the same amount every month. Hence, people are willing to sacrifice their personal freedom and work under others’ instructions as long as they feel financially secure. However, such a motive could lead to a stagnant lifestyle, as employees become more comfortable and avoid taking risks to improve their lives.
On the other hand, I believe working independently is more advantageous. Being one’s own boss means having to make all work-related decisions independently. This helps develop decision-making skills, as individuals must carefully consider their choices to ensure business success. Additionally, being a freelancer requires managing all aspects of a business independently, which significantly contributes to their versatility. This is evident in many freelancing professions, particularly social media influencers, who not only create content to promote their personal brands but also act and film themselves simultaneously. Hence, being self-employed helps a person develop skills in multiple areas.
In conclusion, despite the financial security that employment provides, I am convinced that working for oneself is more beneficial, as it puts people in situations that require them to solve problems independently, enabling them to develop in multiple areas.