In recent years, individuals have caused devastating impacts on global flora and fauna. Opinions are divided about whether or not some measure could be taken to tackle this concerning problem. While it seems like a daunting task to raise awareness among people, I believe the involvement of governments can make a huge contribution to saving wildlife.
On the one hand, it is not achievable to prevent people from harming nature. As there are several billions of humans living in various parts of the world, it is challenging to inform them about the potential consequences their activities lead to. However, I consider that even though most people living in urban areas are well aware of the destructive effects they have on the planet, such as hunting rare animals and demolishing trees, they neglect them and keep pursuing their environmentally disadvantaged activities to make money. Considering this side of the argument, any possible change can be ineffective.
On the other hand, preventative measures can work with the engagement of governments. Local authorities, through their elected politicians, can introduce laws against disruptive practices carried out by individuals. Governments may develop legislation to conserve biodiversity, which in turn establishes standards, guidelines, and penalties to deter and discourage harmful activities that have a negative impact on current biodiversity. Without the interference of governments, any changes intended to avoid humans’ disruptive behavior can be unsuccessful.
In conclusion, the preservation of wildlife has led to many debates throughout the globe, given that a wide range of human activities have been causing problems for animals and plants involving shrinking habitats and deforestation, making hundreds of living creatures extinct. Even though making some alterations seems impossible, I strongly believe that with law enforcement, governments are able to stop such hazardous practices.