In several parts of the world, many large unions are beginning to relocate their factories to rural areas. This essay will explore both, the advantages and disadvantages of this trend, and demonstrate why the drawbacks of this scenario are much greater than its benefits.
On the one hand, relocating big companies to the countryside can enhance standards of living by creating new job opportunities and improving education systems. When large companies move to rural areas, many of their former employees may not relocate with them, which can enhance the recruitment of local residents. Moreover, the relocation of big businesses to rural areas can attract more people, prompting the government to allocate additional funds for building new universities and schools to meet the growing demand and prevent dissatisfaction among residents. For instance, after Uzbekistan moved its big companies to the countryside, the government built dozens of universities and schools in a year.
On the other hand, moving big factories to the countryside can lower the overall health rate there. This is because these factories are likely to increase air pollution levels and damage food products. For example, since the Kazakhstan government relocated large factories to rural areas, the average public health level has dropped significantly there. This decrease can be attributed to the substantial amount of toxic gases emitted by these unions, which can pollute the atmosphere. In addition, many companies involved in mining valuable resources can lower the soil efficacy and even introduce various harmful elements into it. Recent research has proved that the risk of heart-related and blood circulation problems is high near minefields due to poisoned food products.
In conclusion, although living conditions benefit from the relocation of big businesses to rural areas, I believe that the drawbacks of this development are much more significant.