In various nations, most stores and goods are identical. Some people believe that this is an optimistic tendency, while others suppose it is a pessimistic one. In this essay, I will discuss both perspectives and conclude my personal view subsequently.
Some popular perspectives suppose that similar shops and products would confer substantial benefits thanks to time and close management. Regarding the former, identical stores located in several areas offer the popularity, customers would enter any nearby stores without long distance and seeking processes because every shop is the same. For instance, minimarts named Vinmart sell the same products widespread in every area, saving time for dwellers. With respect to the latter, every mall retail the same products would foster the management of the government thanks to the similarity of them. They could promulgate identical regulations and laws that are suitable for all stores at once.
Meanwhile, others believe that this tendency would have various repercussions due to the lack of professional ability and diversity. Training every seller to gain enough knowledge about every sort of product may be impossible because each other possesses their own capability. The lack of understanding about goods may act as a precursor to various consequences such as misleading. Besides, retailing similar products in identical shops would limit the diversity of shopping, affecting clients’ opportunities to purchase. Hence, this may directly decrease the interests of people for this aspect due to this phenomenon’s monotonous nature and limited options, reducing the revenue for stores.
In conclusion, although people believe that same shops and products would confer abundant advantages thanks to time and close management. However, I am convinced that this is a negative development due to the lack of professional ability and diversity.