Nowadays, the issue about chasing well-known individuals by paparazzi without permission has been increased. Many people argue that the right of privacy is belong just for unknown individuals. In my opinion, I believe that privacy is everyone’s rights, but it still has the difference for famous people.
There are a lot of news that inform society about several official reports are made by public figure for the police due to unconvenient behavior from press. In this view, some behavior from reporters can be a threat for family and the environment such as sneeking to celebrity’s home and taking inappropriate photos. The rules about human rights include privacy are not only created for certain communities but also it is applied to everyone.
Conversely, another perspective posits that being famous plays a crucial role in decreasing privacy of someone. Fame is considered by public as the hardest thing to achieve due to the risk that influence the way people live which means society will often to question and curious about celebrity’s personal life. This situation may lead to the increasing of some articles that are made by the press, writing some attractive news to enhance the rate views. Rate views is the only parameter for determine reporter’s salary.
In conclusion, the debate surrounding privacy of people’s life involves contrasting perspectives. Despite of several various of viewpoints, I firmly believe public figures have rights to privacy same like ordinary people, providing security and maintaining mental health. Due to rampant of suicide, people should limit their sharing to social media to prevent cyberbullying.
