Urbanization and modern life have presented us with a number of challenges and decisions. In today’s fast-paced society, as technology develops nothing remains untouched and pictures are no exception. There has emerged a debate among individuals about wheatear new tools and technology in photograph industry can be detrimental. In my opinion, although they offer some advantages, the cons outnumber the pros, so it is not a appropriate development.
On the one hand, some proponents claim that it has a multiple implications across different domains. For example, this way, people can increase the quality of their photos. They contend consider the situation that after a nice holiday they realized that the photos that they took do not have the standard quality. Here the growth of technology can pave the way for them to make it better. Therefore, it is one of its benefit because there is not a chance for them to take the photo again. As a result, it makes our lives mush more convenient.
On the other hand, many opponents believe that some technic and technology designed to streamline our lives may ultimately be counterproductive in many aspects. For instance, nowadays, we witness in social media that a number of celebrities use filter and other tools on a deceptive way. As a case in point, they advertise for some beauties product that are flashy but poor in quality. They use filters to convince the individuals that these goods have a significant impact while it is completely fake. resulting in the sense of fallacious.
In conclusion, while many argue that advancement in science has altered the way of taking photo and it has a beneficial impact, many believe useful though these tools are to bridge the gap between old methods and state-of-the-art ones, the irony is that they can use in unuseful way. From my prospective, it is a negative development.