Opinions are divergent on/regarding whether the government should or shouldnot offer university admissions to a large number of young people. While I admit that colleges help people have a better self growth, I suppose that it is not always the truth.
To begin with, if the state supplies a large number of university education institutions, young people will have more opportunities to obtain comprehensive knowledge. First, university entry requirements will be reduced, allowing young people with low marks to be admitted. Second,as the number of young people with university degrees grows, so does the availability of skilled labor, which helps to strengthen the country’s economy. In addition tuition prices will be reduced, giving young people facing financial challenges more possibilities to pursue higher education. As in Vietnam, university pedagogical faculties are tuition-free, and even assist students with living costs to alleviate the stress of tuition, which is one of the primary reasons why young people find it difficult to enter higher education.
On the other hand, I believe it is difficult to give nearly all young people with access to extracurricular education. Today, the demand for college-level instruction is increasing at an alarming rate. This puts government agencies in a quandary as to whether they should risk encouraging young people to attend university, which takes at least four years to complete and thus face financial constraints due to astronomical educational costs at many leading universities, such as Foreign Trade University or National Economics University in Vietnam. Furthermore, colleges are simply unable to cater for such a dramatic increase in student numbers on the school’s premises due to a lack of required equipment and personnel for instruction.
In conclusion, I believe that promoting and providing additional educational opportunities for adolescents is an advantageous move, but it must be customized to each individual’s particular circumstances and requirements.