In recent years, a considerable number of people contend that the authorities are investing a substantial amount of money on wildlife projects instead of focusing on more urgent challenges. In this essay, I will explore both perspectives and explain why I completely agree with the statement by providing compelling arguments and relevant examples.
To commence with, there are several reasons why many individuals believe that funding wildlife projects can be beneficial on various aspects of life. Firstly, allocating the large portion of government budget on wildlife helps develop tourism and boost the economy, as such destinations and landmarks attract tourists, and it brings more economic benefits. Secondly, this trend helps preserving the natural balance because wild plants and forests help clean the air, and one main reason is that wild birds eat insects; as a result, insects do not have the chance to spread diseases.
In contrast, essential areas such as healthcare may suffer from lack of financial investment, and some argue that such projects provide no short-term advantages. Initially, spending too much money on wildlife causes several health complications, as a substantial amount of money is invested in other areas cause lack of financial investment in wildlife. Consequently, a growing number of people suffer from serious health issues. In addition, wildlife protection demands long time to represent positive effects, however, it would be better to allocate much money to other urgent issues.
To conclude, although spending the majority of government money on wildlife offers numerous economic advantages, it would be great to to focus on essential areas such as healthcare. Hence, I firmly agree with those who believe spending much money on other pressing concerns is better.