Some authorities consider the economy as a most pressing issue to progress, while some individuals argue that there are other form of advancments, which require equal attention. While I believe economy affect on important aspects of living directly, it would not last very much if we neglect other areas.
Admittedly, the economic progress is felt more in daily life. The amount of importation and exportation would increase dramatically, and local currency would find a better value, which affect on trades and living expenses. Furthermore, the number of unemployed people will drop, and as a consequence the amount of general happiness and satisfaction in the public would climb up.
On the other hand, lack of a comprehensive objective leads to an unbalanced system, that would cause additional problems. For example, if a government invest just in capital subjects without smooth political connection with the neighbor countries, it would trigger them to start new wars. Addtionally, in well-developed countries the improvements in non-economic issue have arisen primarily, and after that economy has affected from that growth. For instance, Germany advanced frist in education, it led to industrial evelution, and eventually it exprienced a significant growth in vehicle production industry, and the largest factories such az Benz and BMW have taken place in this country.
In conclusion, it is obvious adopting a bias approach to progress economy solely, in spite of its benefits in short time, would diminish in long term.