A major number of individuals are of the opinion that the dwellers in big cities should be provided with chargeless mass transit. This essay will elaborate on both its favorable and undesirable consequences.
Predominantly, this suggestion will unfold certain merits, one of which is a decrease in congestion. Provided that people pay no money for utilizing public transportation, they will be more encouraged to commute on it, leading to the number of privately-owned vehicles used by residents to plummet. Consequently, there will be fewer traffic jams in city centres. Additionally, the fewer vehicles travel on roads, the less greenhouse gas emission and air pollution ensue around the world. To be more specific, public vehicles are eco-friendly, thereby being an essential sustainable environmental practice to maintain a healthy ecosystem.
Nonetheless, the demerits of this policy are inevitable, and one of them is overcrowding. In view of the fact that people grow more inclination towards that system due to its free usage, the level of people travelling regularly with the help of it will rise inordinately, resulting in the overabundance of human beings on public transportation systems. Another drawback worthy mentioning is that those vehicles are deemed to be unsafe owing to the fact that petty criminal deeds are prevalent there. According to the survey held in 2014 by Cambridge University, the reason why most people eschew exploiting urban transportation service was that 45% of them encountered either pickpocketing or sexual haressment, which was attributable to them being cautious as to whether to travel on them or not, despite its cheap prices.
In conclusion, albeit the potential benefits that are suggested through this strategy, the aforementioned drawbacks evolve. I am afraid that if those vehicles are equipped with less security and supervision, dwellers downtown will avoid using them in the future.