In democracy era when everyone has a oportinuty to going on abroad to work and live due to economical and personal growth advantages. The advantages outweight the disadvantages.
Economic opportunity for the majority of people is considered a main advantage. Salaries in developed economies such as the USA or Canada can be several times higher than in many developing countries, reflecting the difference in market demand for specialized skills. This is explained by a specific feature of the job market structure, such as the level of technology development. Consequently, professions such as data analyst, AI engineer, and a variety of engineering professions, which are non-popular in the Tier-3 job market, become more valuable abroad.
On the other hand, personal growth is also an advantage, since living abroad provides a diversity of points of view. Cultural features of one nation might be viewed as a shock in other cultures. For instance, a tradition known as “Qyz Alyp Qashu” (translated literally as “to take a girl and run away”) exists in Kazakh culture . It is a Kazakh practice related to marriage. For some countries this is a really incredible tradition, and some people can say ‘this is a serious violation of human rights ‘. Nevertheless, for the Kazakh nation this is one of the fundamental parts of the culture. This works both ways: just as I, as a Kazakh, might find another country’s customs strange when I move abroad, foreigners visiting Kazakhstan can be equally surprised by traditions like Qyz Alyp Qashu.
Moving abroad for work offers powerful economic benefits and personal growth. Higher salaries in developed nations reward specialized tech and engineering skills, while cross-cultural experiences broaden worldviews. Despite culture shocks like differing views on traditional practices, the long-term advantages of global mobility outweigh the drawbacks.