There is a widespread belief that digital devices are the main contemporary source of information, which leads to the disfavour of books and magazines. I respectfully disagree with this point of view and contend that there will always be a need for regular printed sources of data for numerous compelling reasons, including but not limited to the possibility to use them without internet connection or some special gadgets and emotional content.
First and foremost, people need access to the Internet to observe some news using computers. Moreover, one needs to purchase electronic devices, which are more expensive than books or papers. Therefore, people who live in places without Internet coverage or cannot afford such expenditures as computers or telephones gravitate towards traditional printed sources of information. Additionally, elderly tend to read magazines and newspapers, because they are easier for them to read. For example, my grandpa’s main sources of data are books and papers, because he has no need to buy a computer and he can use cheaper sources to gather useful information.
In addition, a growing number of people opted to purchase regular books just for their heart’s content. Furthermore, some scientists argue that the odour of new books can bring a sense of joy for their readers. From my point of view, gathering a collection of books can undoubtedly give a sense of fulfillment and help people who think that their lives are aimless. For instance, I have recently heard from the news that a girl who had mental problems and was diagnosed with depression, found interest in books and eventually found out how to be elated again.
In conclusion, an increasing number of individuals, particular youths, tend to use electronic sources of data. However, from my point of view, regular printed books and papers have a number of merits, such as independence of internet access or additional expensive devices and emotional pleasure.