It is commonly believed that all library buildings will be removed and replaced by online platforms to provide access to a greater number of people than existing facilities. I firmly believe that there are both clear advantages in terms unlimited storage or a wider range of accessibility and significant drawbacks, including digital inequality as well as possible health issues, to this development.
From a positive viewpoint, this shift offers no physical storage limits, unlike traditional public libraries. This is considered to be crucial as people would not visit a library if they do not find their favorite books. Online bookshops or libraries can address this problem by providing individuals with numerous genres of books because there will be no problems related to space capacity to place books. Moreover, people would enjoy day-and-night access that would benefit them in many ways. For instance, readers would not waste any time or energy visiting the library building and get special permission to read there. Furthermore, people could share books with each other instantly or personalize their reading experience via innovative digital features.
On the other hand, from a negative perspective, this trend might lead to digital inequality as access to the internet varies among people. For instance, readers living in remote areas or rural villages would not be able to benefit from those online libraries. It can be seen as clear evidence of social division because people should not be restricted from reading books due to unstable internet access. Additionally, people may start to lead a sedentary lifestyle as there will be no need to travel to libraries, thereby encouraging people to rely heavily on their electronic devices, even in their leisure time. The adverse effect of this development to human’s eyes is another serious risk that can be considered as a disadvantage.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that the trend of creating online apps or websites instead of requiring people to visit physical libraries can have both strengths and weaknesses. Therefore, this decision should be discussed properly to avoid any negative consequences for general readers.