The government allocations for recreating ancient buildings in urban areas has sparked a debate about it’s appropriates. While others contend this funds should be curtailed. Instead of restorating of old structures, focus should be on new house with modern infrastructure and road development. I inclined to disagree with this perspective.
On the one hand, historical buildings are often referred to as cultural heritage. They embody their cultural supports to their nation. Moreover, it supports the economy for local region. Restoration of this ancient buildings, fosters the cultural habits to tourists. In addition to, it inclines the safety for vistors who is visiting this places. For instance, one of the world wonders in india, Tajmahal, it is commonly known for its beautiful infrastructure and the ancient buildings. People should be focusing on the preservation and restoration of old historical buildings to future generation. Addition to france, venice and italy , meticulous restoration of ancient buildings, its fosters the economy via tourism. Moreover it supports the local business vendors like tickets price, accomodation and travel expenses through this local business people growth should be markable upward.
On the other hand, some of the people saying this government fund should be used to build a new accomodaion and road infrastructure. Eventhough, it has benefits also but due to this only few people will get benefits but while focusing into renovation of old buildings tend to help many people.
In conclusion, renovating the historical old buildings fosters the economy for nation and local areas. It boosts the economical growth to the country via tourism.