It is considered by some individuals that air travel should be implemented strict law to stop air pollution. While other believed are not agree with it. My prospect purify air is beneficial for public. Therefore, lawsmaker should take importance steps, which can elleivate these problems. This will highlight the both views of the statement.
On the one hand, there are various reasons to behind this trend but the first and foremost point is that it helps to safe environment. To explain government makes rules to reduce air pollution, which assist to stop climate change then air will purify and clean due to this people can live safe in the world. For example, a survey conducted by the Moscow newspaper shows that65%of rules and regulations of power did reduce emissions, it can not put on affect the temperature. Therefore, it is quite clear that this approach is beneficial for climate.
On the other hand, there are several drawbacks, the prominent point is that it affects economy. To elaborate, large industries significant contributions to planes innovations, where need a team workers; with the assistance grow economy, if this stop then they losses their jobs, which will biggest loss to companies. To opitome, Japanese lawmakers revealed that 55% of companies are against of this implements because of this they can face large losses by the air travel. Thus, it is proven that it is not only effect national economy growth but also reduce employment in the countries.
To conclude, although this phenomena can effect on economy but I believed that toxic gases will be reduced then public can enjoy safe and healthy environment.