Some people believe that anonymity on the internet is an essential right and enables freedom of speech and protects whistleblowers, while others believe it encourages irresponsible behavior, the spread cyberbullying, and misinformation, therefore supporting the idea of mandatory identification.
Supporters of allowing anonymity on the internet argue that anonymity is a fundamental right that has many significant advantages, including that it allows others to express their freedom of speech freely, all without being exposed of their identity. Additionally, supporters also emphasize that anonymity allows individuals to discuss sensitive topics, such as mental health or financial struggles, without having to reveal themselves or experiencing fear of criticism.
Opponents, however, point out that anonymity promotes negativity, which include irresponsible and inappropriate behavior, the spread of cyberbullying, and the spread of misinformation. Enabling anonymity on the internet can lead to various negative impacts on individuals mental health. Therefore, discouraging anonymity online can lead to better outcomes, as it would help prevent the will to interact in any way that would hurt another individuals feelings.
In summary, although some individuals argue about the benefits of allowing anonymity, others oppose and claim it can have many negative impacts and lead to various negative outcomes with no consequences.