In contemporary society, many individuals believe that administration should support artists, while others argue that the money should be spent on public services. This essay will explore both aspects before asserting that, despite the merits of supporting artists , allocating government fund on public services offers more far-reaching and impactful approach to addressing national needs.
Proponents of artists support often highlight immediate and short term benefits. Allocation of funds to support artists allows to foster extra curricular activities by nurturing national culture. For instance, Russia encourages their singers to spread their identity, history as well as culture to the whole world. As a result, students of every educationao institutions may show interest in their nation’s culture an play an effective role.
Conversely, the argument for spending money on public services rests on broader impact. Ensuring proper enhancement in public hospitals, school or roads can lead to a significant economical development. Not only productivity, but it will also improve the quality of life. For example, roads with poor condition can create a detrimental effect on communication. Moreover, a country is considerably depended on their public services which is a key part of overall enhancement.
In conclusion, despite the understandable approach of providing support towards artists, I firmly believe that, spending money on public health is more favourable due to it’s greater impact.
