It often argued that good economy is the best way to eliminate hunger and poverty, while others point out that it has devastating effect on the environment. This essay will discuss both sides before presenting a balanced approach.
It is undeniable that economic growth is a promising way to address the issues such as starvation and financial distress. Improved business sector can guarantee to fulfill the basic needs of human beings such as food and shelters. With enough income for a family, individuals consume healthy and nutritious food leading to a healthier lifestyle and a carefree life. Therefore, improvement in national economy is the corner stone to wipe out hunger and poverty.
However, promoting economy in reckless ways brings negative impacts on nature, which I agree with. Rather than stopping and trying to reverse the development, governments and individuals could find ways to reduce undesirable consequences on the surrounding. For example, the impacts of tourisms on historic sites and wild lives could be mitigated by establishing stringent environmental regulations while maintaining a handsome amount of revenue for local residents. Imposing a heavy fine on anyone who violates the standard laws not only protects natural habitats but collects some funding for the government to use in the well-being of the society such as providing food to the poor and offering loans for the people who need to start a small business.
In conclusion, a prosperous society can help stops people being hungry and poor while disturbing nature. I believe it is ultimately crucial to find sustainable ways to boost economy without damaging the environment.