Keep animal in imprisonment believed to always be wrong by come people. Meanwhile another person say that have advantages for animal and human. I would agree that keep animal in zoo is big wrong.
Convincing animals in the zoo does have benefit for animals and humans. The first benefits is protection animals from hunters. This is one of way to prevent animals so that they do not become extinct in later life. Moreover, the foot animal is awake. Typically the workers of zoo give food to animals according to the time. Furthermore of keep animal in imprisonment is animal health is maintained. Because, if animal have sick, the worker can call veterinarian to check up the animal. Therefore animal health is guaranteed. For instance, tiger have difficulty living in wild forests, because a lot of forests have been cut down.
On the other hand, I believe that is wrong to keep animal in captivity. Firstly, the animals not feel enjoy like if in wildlife. Because every animals have each habitat. If they live in zoo, they can’t comfortable. As a result, the animals become stress. Secondly, the animals will lost hunting instincts. Given that, they can’t go everywhere. And the last reason is animal abuse. This is become because human can understand the consequences from their action or they do it because they earn financial advantages. To illustrate, with keep animal in zoo people will earn money for visitor tickets. From my perspective, keep animal in imprisonment is huge mistake.
By way of conclusion, keep animal in captivity have advantages, in contrast I would argue it is a wrong action.