In the contemporary era, zoos are the most significant places for the animals to preserve, sparking a contentious debate among individuals. Some argue that captivating the animals at zoo is inappropriate, while others believe that it plays a pivotal role in both entertainment and economic growth. This essay will delve into both perspectives in the below paragraphs and offer a balanced view.
On the one hand, opponents of zoos contend that confining animals for human observation is normally wrong. Most instrumentally, captivating animals at zoos can lead to lose their natural habits. For instance, a tiger can deprive from its usual habit of hunting deer at forest and detained a limited place. Furthermore, artificial environment in zoos often fail to meet the social needs of wild animals, resulting in captivated animals encounter with stress and distress.
On the other hand, supporters of zoos emphasize its remarkable role in both entertaining and economically. Firstly, zoos can be one of the most notable elements for individuals’ lives in receiving numerous entertainment through visiting the appealing features of zoos. Zoos can considerably allow the spontaneous people to observe the wild animals on live such as tiger, elephants, deer etc. secondly, zoos can enhance the economic development of a nation through visiting a large number of visitors. For instance, a survey directed by The Star Newspaper in 2020, published that zoos could help to generate 6% country’s GDP annually in Bangladesh, and created many job opportunities for the local people. Therefore, it is needless to say that the importance of zoo in both entertainment and economic cannot be overlooked.
In conclusion, despite potential drawbacks, I firmly believe that zoos can have a positive impact of any nations to enhance the entertainment and economic prosperity through its appealing features. At the same time, confining the wild animals at zoo can be a productive method to preserve the animal extinction from the predators.