It is widely debated whether using non-human species for medical experimentations for the sake of human wellbeing is acceptable or unethical. While some people believe that it is essential action to prioritize human’s health and life over animals, I strongly believe in the merit of cherishing other sentient beings’ lives.
On one hand, the reason why researchers opt to use animals in their experiment because they prioritize human safety. They believe that genetic similarities between animals and humans may provide reliable results before applying treatment to human subjects. For example, cosmetic companies utilize rat laboratories to conduct their product research and assess if their treatments are effective in rejuvenating human skin. In addition, complying with ethical and regulatory requirements is necessary. In order to introduce a health and cosmetic products into the consuming market, these medical and beauty companies have to go through staggering rigorous tests on animals to meet the requirements of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in United State.
On the other hand, it is undeniable that this medical research actually is unethical because all living creatures deserve to live not to serve human purpose. Taking their lives or causing them pain only for the human benefit is undoubtedly cruel. There are more ethically sound alternatives (nhung Phuong phap thay the hop ly ve mat dao duc) such as computer modeling or cell cultures. Furthermore, scientists have/face limitation in fully understanding outcomes due to differences between human and animal bodies. This can cause misleading and even higher chance to risk human’s health.
Personally, I firmly believe that while human’s health is essential and it should be taken care properly by authorities and health experts; however, other species’ lives are equally crucial as well and they should be protected by human. Therefore, I advocate that regulators should encourage health and medical organizations to use artificial intelligence products to produce treatments without the need for (thay vi instead of) animal testing.
In conclusion, even though the sacrifices of animals are perceived as contributions for human-being developments, I still believe that we are capable of using other safer and more humane approaches to medical innovations.