An increasing number of individuals believe that attractively designed urban areas visually inspire residents, whereas others argue that visual aspects are less important and assume that the functionality of cities is essential. I firmly disagree with the view that functionality alone should be prioritised. This essay will discuss both perspectives and present my own opinion.
It is clear that visually appealing cities can improve residents’ quality of life. In addition, they encourage tourists to spend more time engaging in outdoor activities, which helps to boost the local economy. Large recreational areas and distinctive local architecture, which can be modernised over time, contribute to a strong sense of identity. For example, cities with aesthetic environments and rich cultural heritage can develop tourism zones that significantly enhance government revenue.
By contrast, some residents believe that functional urban planning is more important, as cities must meet the basic needs of their populations. Firstly, local governments should provide accessible healthcare and educational institutions for ordinary families, focusing on practical requirements. For instance, efficient infrastructure and public services support a sustainable lifestyle and long-term urban development.
In conclusion, I believe that local communities should strike a balance between both approaches. Sustainable urban development can successfully achieve both beauty and efficiency.