Wild animals are kept in zoos all over the world. Currently, zoos serve as a tourist attraction in many countries and rely on wild animals to attract visitors. I believe that wild creatures should not be confined in zoos, and there should be alternative ways to observe them.
There are several justifications for having zoos in our cities. Most notably, they draw tourists and generate revenue for the city. Visitors have the opportunity to observe wild animals that they would not typically see without traveling long distances. Endangered species like the Chinese panda, Indian tiger, or African rhino, for instance, are protected in zoos, which play a crucial role in their conservation. Hence, we should not underestimate the educational value of zoos.
Nevertheless, many individuals argue that wild animals deserve to be free, rather than confined in cages and limited spaces in zoos. This captivity is harsh for the animals and often leads to their demise due to the unnatural environment. News reports frequently highlight rare animals dying in zoos or falling ill because the space provided is inadequate or unsuitable for creatures like lions or polar bears. Moreover, these animals exhibit signs of distress and may even pose a threat to humans. Confining wild animals in zoos is detrimental to their well-being and constitutes cruelty.
While both perspectives present valid points, my strong conviction is that zoos are not suitable habitats for wild animals. If animals require care, they should be looked after in their natural environment, such as in game parks or wildlife reserves. Governments ought to assume responsibility for safeguarding their nation’s precious wildlife and should consider shutting down zoos that capitalize on them.
In conclusion, despite the argument that zoos are beneficial for housing wild animals to generate income and educate the public, I maintain that zoos are no longer necessary. We now have the ability to observe wild animals online and take satisfaction in knowing that they are living freely.