It is widely believed that to alleviate the academic pressure on students, subjects like cookery or physical education should be removed. I tend to believe that while some students feel more overwhelmed and stressed because of those classes, many others enjoy and find them refreshing and relaxing.
Schools and universities consist of different individuals, which means each of them has different strengths and preferences. This illustrates that an individual approach is required to solve this issue, which can be done by giving students a choice to pick the subjects they want to learn. To cite an example, a student who does not perform well in academic subjects but has the creativity and commitment required for art-related lessons will clearly feel more oppressed with academic lessons only.
Another primary reason for this view is the knowledge that students gain from those lessons. Physical education spreads awareness of the importance of a healthy and sporty lifestyle. Subjects, such as poetry and art play a contributory role in guiding individuals towards a creative and unique future. Cookery formulates practical skills and develops confidence. The practical illiteracy of these subjects can lead to negative ramifications, which indicates that entirely removing those classes can lead to widespread unawareness.
In conclusion, the perception of these subjects varies for different students. Before removing them, it is essential to consider their possible implications, which can lead to higher rates of stress, rather than easing the academic pressure. Allowing teenagers to choose subjects they learn cannot just improve their mental well-being, but also create a sense of independence.