In modern society, young people face significant pressure to achieve academic success. As a result, some people argue that non-academic subjects such as physical education and cookery should be removed from the school curriculum so that students can focus entirely on academic studies. However, I strongly disagree with this view because these subjects are essential for reducing stress and developing practical skills.
Firstly, non-academic subjects help students relieve the pressure caused by academic studies. In many schools, teachers place great emphasis on achieving high grades in core subjects such as mathematics and science. Consequently, students often experience considerable stress while trying to meet these expectations. Subjects like physical education, art, or cooking provide an opportunity for students to relax and temporarily shift their attention away from academic work. As a result, they can return to their studies feeling refreshed and more capable of concentrating effectively.
Secondly, extracurricular subjects allow students to develop valuable practical skills that may benefit their future careers. Not every student excels in traditional academic subjects, but many possess talents in areas such as sports, arts, or creative activities. Schools should provide opportunities for these students to discover and develop their abilities. For example, students who learn practical skills such as cooking, crafting, or pottery may later turn these talents into successful careers or small businesses.
In conclusion, although academic subjects are undeniably important, non-academic subjects also play a crucial role in students’ overall development. Therefore, they should remain an essential part of the school curriculum rather than being removed.
