While old buildings and places are considered national treasures, some individuals argue that the money spent on renovating these structures could be better allocated to building new houses and developing roads. I partially agree with this perspective.
Firstly, urban development is crucial for improving the lifestyle of residents. The transportation of essential goods and materials is vital for the community. For instance, several old buildings in Bhaktapur that were demolished by the earthquake are yet to be reconstructed due to insufficient material supply from other areas, which is a consequence of poor road conditions.
On the other hand, old buildings and heritage sites are essential for attracting tourists. A nation benefits from international travelers and their spending in the city. For example, according to research conducted by the Nepal Government, a significant portion of Nepal’s income comes from tourists visiting from abroad. This influx of visitors boosts the country’s economy, and maintaining old monuments is crucial for drawing in tourists.
In conclusion, preserving old buildings should be a top priority, as they often provide a better return on investment than developing new houses and roads. It is important to allocate a sufficient budget for renovating these historical sites while also investing in new infrastructure.