•Rising university fees and scarce employment prospects for graduates have led some people to say that universities should not teach arts subjects, like philosophy and history, and only offer practical degree courses that maximise chances of employment. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It has been observed that increasing the amount of fees by universities on the one hand and lack of job opportunities for graduates on other hand made people to think that universities should focus on practical degree courses to expand employment opportunities rather than faculties like philosophy and history. I partly agree with the given […]

Currently, students grapple with the escalation of tuition fees and confront the high unemployment risks, which polarize public discourse about whether tertiary schools should eliminate non-core subjects such as doctrine and chronicle for the sake of job prospects. From my standpoint, I concede that the merits of these extracurricular courses far outweigh their demerits as […]

Given the increasing cost of university tuition and limited graduate job opportunities, it is often suggested that universities focus solely on degree courses which are practical rather than artistic subjects. However, I strongly disagree with this point of view, as I believe that subjects such as art and philosophy can instill valuable critical thinking skills, […]

As a result of rising education expenses and uncertain employment prospects for graduates, many people have proposed that arts subjects, such as philosophy and history, should be removed from the curriculum of universities to minimize the chances of unemployment. I fully agree with this statement as it will decrease university fees and the main emphasis […]