Currently, students grapple with the escalation of tuition fees and confront the high unemployment risks, which polarize public discourse about whether tertiary schools should eliminate non-core subjects such as doctrine and chronicle for the sake of job prospects. From my standpoint, I concede that the merits of these extracurricular courses far outweigh their demerits as an effective facilitator for a career path.
On the one hand, some air the view that the reduction of financial pressure via getting rid of several art lessons functions as the premise for skyrocketing educational levels, especially when the sky-high charges of higher education have set up more and more obstacles for low-income families. Concurrently, as a corollary of tense class time and heavy workload, instead of squandering school hours for some superfluous experience, the more time learners apply themselves to official knowledge, the more opportunities elevate their employment prospects. Hence, not only will their productivity and performance be enhanced significantly, but it also scarcely put livelihood strain on themselves. For instance, Ha Noi Medical University, where famous for its commendable disciplines and clear policies related to practical application, mainly due to the bountiful nature of faculies such as oral maxillofacial surgeons, vets and medical examiners, whilst still guaranteeing the potential occupations.
On the other hand, except for some aforementioned cons, I notice that there are countless pros associated with interweaving several vocational subjects sententiously. Retaining arts subjects is indispensable as they contribute greatly to the development of soft skills and an adaptable mindset. Arts disciplines foster qualities like communication, interpretation, and the ability to approach problems from multiple perspectives—skills that are increasingly sought after in leadership roles and creative industries. Furthermore, subjects such as philosophy and history help cultivate a sense of cultural literacy, allowing graduates to navigate a globalised world with greater understanding and sensitivity. Indeed, the value of a university education transcends immediate economic returns; it lies in nurturing holistic human beings capable of contributing meaningfully to different aspects of society, thus improving not only employability but also the quality of civic life.
In conclusion, prioritising employability over the arts would undermine both personal growth and societal progress. A balanced education is vital for nurturing adaptable, well-rounded individuals.